“…In some of them, only the primary cortical components Nl and/or P2 were reliably proven, but more complex cortical responses were also present in their patients. Hence, the results reported by Kotchoubey and other authors indicating a high frequency of responses in association cortical areas in patients with PVS should be taken into consideration for future research, because these neurophysiological techniques are capable of providing earlier and different brain functioning signs compared to fMRI, PET and SPECT 721, 48,163,165,167,168,195,1967. Kotchoubey and his group argued that their results, indicating a high frequency of cortical responses in patients with PVS, might be due to an indication of possible diagnostic errors, or as evidence that isolated thalamo-cortical circuits may be working in patients with PVS, indicating spared function of some specialized processing modules, although this process is unrelated to conscious experience 716, 44,80,118,121-124,128,179,2187. Nonetheless, it is important to consider the time and space resolutions in assessing brain function comparing neurophysiological with other neuroimaging methods.…”