2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-015-9842-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source and high-frequency decay parameters for the Azores region for stochastic finite-fault ground motion simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were found between these groups and all data were therefore grouped together. For the central west area, Carvalho et al (2015) did a coda Q study using geometrical spreading parameter 1.0, window length 20 s and lapse time at two times the S-travel time and got Q 76f 0:69 . The parameters are almost the same as our alternative parameters and the Q-relation also nearly the same.…”
Section: The Azores Archipelagomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant differences were found between these groups and all data were therefore grouped together. For the central west area, Carvalho et al (2015) did a coda Q study using geometrical spreading parameter 1.0, window length 20 s and lapse time at two times the S-travel time and got Q 76f 0:69 . The parameters are almost the same as our alternative parameters and the Q-relation also nearly the same.…”
Section: The Azores Archipelagomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the path effects, two alternative geometric spreading models are tested: The first model was already employed by the study of Zonno et al (2010) and the second model is the region-specific model proposed by the study of Carvalho et al (2016).…”
Section: Ground Motion Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the quality factor, two different models are tested: The model employed by Zonno et al (2010) and the region-specific model of Carvalho et al (2016).…”
Section: Ground Motion Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where b 1 = 1.0, b 2 = 0, and b 3 = 0.5, and R 01 and R 02 are related to crustal thickness ( D ; Carvalho et al, 2016). The average crustal thickness in Yunnan Province is 40 km (Su et al, 2006), so R 01 = 1.5 D = 60 km and R 02 = 2.5 D = 100 km.…”
Section: Simulation Of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake With A Magnitude Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%