2013
DOI: 10.1351/pac-con-12-10-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from polluted rivers

Abstract: Over the past few decades, in response to growing concerns about the impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on human health, a variety of environmental forensics and geochemical techniques have emerged for studying organic pollutants. These techniques include chemical fingerprinting, receptor modeling, and compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA). Chemical fingerprinting methodology involves the use of diagnostic ratios. Receptor modeling techniques include the chemical mass balance (CMB) mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(152 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that ratios of Flu/Pyr, Flu/(Flu+Pyr), and LMW/HMW in sediment and water from all stations were <1, between 0.4-0.5, except St 1 that were not available for PAHs in water, and <1, respectively. Those results suggested that mixed sources were derived from petroleum, petroleum combustion, and pyrogenic sources [41]. These results were also supported by a cross plot diagram between BaA/228 vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Ant/178 vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Ant/(Ant+Phe) vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Phe/Ant vs Flu/Py, and BaP/(BaP+Chr) vs Ant/(Ant+Phe) (Fig.4).…”
Section: The Sources Of Pahssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Results showed that ratios of Flu/Pyr, Flu/(Flu+Pyr), and LMW/HMW in sediment and water from all stations were <1, between 0.4-0.5, except St 1 that were not available for PAHs in water, and <1, respectively. Those results suggested that mixed sources were derived from petroleum, petroleum combustion, and pyrogenic sources [41]. These results were also supported by a cross plot diagram between BaA/228 vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Ant/178 vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Ant/(Ant+Phe) vs Flu/(Flu+Pyr), Phe/Ant vs Flu/Py, and BaP/(BaP+Chr) vs Ant/(Ant+Phe) (Fig.4).…”
Section: The Sources Of Pahssupporting
confidence: 62%
“… Phen phenanthrene, Anth anthracene, Chry chrysene, BaA benzo[a]anthracene, Flt fluoranthene, Pyr pyrene, InPy indeno(123,cd)pyrene, BghiP benzo[g,h,i]perylene, LMW low molecular weight, HMW high molecular weight (Moyo et al 2013 ; Adeniji et al 2018a , b ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Phen phenanthrene, Anth anthracene, Chry chrysene, BaA benzo[a]anthracene, Flt fluoranthene, Pyr pyrene, InPy indeno(123,cd)pyrene, BghiP benzo[g,h,i]perylene, LMW low molecular weight, HMW high molecular weight (Moyo et al 2013; Adeniji et al 2018)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%