Source Code Analysis with a Temporal Extension of First-Order Logic

Abstract

Formal methods and static analysis are widely used in software development, in particular in the context of safety-critical systems. They can be used to prove that the software behavior complies with its specification: the software correctness. In this article, we address another usage of these methods: the verification of the quality of the source code, i.e., the compliance with guidelines, coding rules, design patterns. Such rules can refer to the structure of the source code through its Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) or to execution paths in the Control Flow Graph (CFG) of functions. AST and CFGs offer complementary information and current methods are not able to exploit both of them simultaneously. In this article, we propose an approach to automatically verifying the compliance of an application with specifications (coding rules) that reason about both the AST of the source code and the CFG of its functions. To formally express the specification, we introduce FO ++ , a logic defined as a temporal extension of many-sorted first-order logic. In our framework, verifying the compliance of the source code comes down to the model-checking problem for FO ++ . We present a correct and complete model checking algorithm for FO ++ and establish that the model checking problem of FO ++ is PSPACE-complete. This approach is implemented into Pangolin, a tool for analyzing C++ programs. We use Pangolin to analyze two middle-sized opensource projects, looking for violations of six coding rules and report on several detected violations.