2022
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2022.2149757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source credibility and plausibility are considered in the validation of textual information: evidence from a social media context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reproduced fewer inaccuracies for easy items they likely knew were wrong than for hard items they were less likely to know were wrong. The Tweet stimuli tested the generalizability of the previous findings derived from single sentence declarative inaccuracies, this time appearing in a social media context (also see Wertgen & Richter, 2023). Experiment 2 additionally assessed the consequences of asking participants to rate whether they would like the Tweets, a decision routine and central to social media interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reproduced fewer inaccuracies for easy items they likely knew were wrong than for hard items they were less likely to know were wrong. The Tweet stimuli tested the generalizability of the previous findings derived from single sentence declarative inaccuracies, this time appearing in a social media context (also see Wertgen & Richter, 2023). Experiment 2 additionally assessed the consequences of asking participants to rate whether they would like the Tweets, a decision routine and central to social media interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%