2010
DOI: 10.1137/100782711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Localization in Random Acoustic Waveguides

Abstract: Abstract. Mode coupling due to scattering by weak random inhomogeneities in waveguides leads to loss of coherence of wave fields at long distances of propagation. This in turn leads to serious deterioration of coherent source localization methods, such as matched field. We study with analysis and numerical simulations how such deterioration occurs and introduce a novel incoherent approach for long range source localization in random waveguides. It is based on a special form of transport theory for the incohere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the functions Φ Dn in (71) are approximately proportional to Φ n , for n = −1, 0, and they give a similar contribution to the focus of the image for a full detector aperture or a smaller one. The focusing of (71) at points x in the support of the reflectivity r is primarily dictated by the coupling matrix S. The best focusing is for S jj = δ jj , corresponding to an incoherent source with θ defined in (14) and a full aperture A s = (0, X). The terms in j =j in the square brackets in (71) vanish in this case and, if in addition the detector has full aperture, the imaging function becomes…”
Section: Quantification Of Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the functions Φ Dn in (71) are approximately proportional to Φ n , for n = −1, 0, and they give a similar contribution to the focus of the image for a full detector aperture or a smaller one. The focusing of (71) at points x in the support of the reflectivity r is primarily dictated by the coupling matrix S. The best focusing is for S jj = δ jj , corresponding to an incoherent source with θ defined in (14) and a full aperture A s = (0, X). The terms in j =j in the square brackets in (71) vanish in this case and, if in addition the detector has full aperture, the imaging function becomes…”
Section: Quantification Of Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [2, 5-9, 19, 20, 23, 24] for mathematical studies of inverse scattering problems in acoustic and elastic waveguides with straight walls, and filled with homogeneous media. Random acoustic waveguides with finite cross-section are considered in [4,11], and with unbounded cross-section, as encountered in ocean acoustics, in [3,21]. Examples of inverse scattering problems in planar electromagnetic waveguides are in [13,17,22], where the problem is reduced to one for the scalar Helmholtz equation by considering a single type of waves, transverse electric or magnetic.…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method there uses definition (3.29) of the Wigner transform for a search range Z s A , and estimates Z A as the minimizer of the misfit between the peak time of the theoretical model (4.9) and the calculated (C j (τ )) 1≤j≤N from the data. It is observed in [8] that the range estimation is not sensitive to knowing the source density and that the search for Z A can be done in conjunction with the estimation of the autocorrelation of the fluctuations, in case it is unknown. The method in [8] has been tested extensively with numerical simulations for both large and small arrays in waveguides with random wave speed.…”
Section: Arrival Time Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%