2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.899772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source localized infraslow neurofeedback training in people with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled feasibility clinical trial

Abstract: Persistent pain is a key symptom in people living with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Infra-slow Neurofeedback (ISF-NF) training is a recent development focusing on modulating cortical slow-wave activity to improve pain outcomes. A parallel, two-armed double-blinded, randomized sham-controlled, feasibility clinical trial aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of a novel electroencephalography-based infraslow fluctuation neurofeedback (EEG ISF-NF) training in people with KOA and determine the variability of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous EEG-NF studies, however, have used conventional neurofeedback techniques, reinforcing alpha (~8–12 Hz) or sensorimotor (~12–15 Hz) rhythms and suppressing a combination of theta (~4–8 Hz) and/or beta (~13–30 Hz) rhythms, at one to two specific electrode levels [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. However, only one study evaluated source-localized EEG-NF training of the ISF (<0.01 Hz) at three cortical regions simultaneously for the treatment of chronic pain [ 68 ]. The source-localized EEG-NF permits training specific and multiple brain regions simultaneously, potentially changing the activity in the trained area and connectivity to/from the trained area [ 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous EEG-NF studies, however, have used conventional neurofeedback techniques, reinforcing alpha (~8–12 Hz) or sensorimotor (~12–15 Hz) rhythms and suppressing a combination of theta (~4–8 Hz) and/or beta (~13–30 Hz) rhythms, at one to two specific electrode levels [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. However, only one study evaluated source-localized EEG-NF training of the ISF (<0.01 Hz) at three cortical regions simultaneously for the treatment of chronic pain [ 68 ]. The source-localized EEG-NF permits training specific and multiple brain regions simultaneously, potentially changing the activity in the trained area and connectivity to/from the trained area [ 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we hypothesise that the source localised EEG-NF specifically targeting the ISF bands in pain processing brain regions (pgACC, dACC, and SSC) could be more effective than targeting higher frequency bands at specific electrode levels and can potentially promote greater pain relief. To date, EEG ISF-NF training has been explored and demonstrated positive results by a few pilot studies as a potential treatment option for food addiction 26 , internalizing disorders 27 , 28 , and osteoarthritic pain 29 . However, none of the studies has explored EEG ISF-NF training as a potential treatment option for treatment of CLBP and is warranted given the high burden of CLBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NF also improves anxiety, emotional regulation, brain activity, and autonomic modulation, potentially mediating mechanisms of pain reduction (56-63). Pilot EEG-NF training targeting infraslow frequency bands demonstrated encouraging patterns for pain outcomes in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain (64,65).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, evidence of the effectiveness of these two self-regulation training methods is lacking in people with knee OA, a common chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain condition. Although both interventions appear to rely on self-regulatory principles, the physiological and psychological mechanisms through which these two interventions improve pain outcomes may be different (63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69). Therefore, identifying the mechanisms for how these self-regulatory interventions improve outcomes can assist in further optimising protocols to enhance outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation