2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119815624.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source, Loss, and Transport of Energetic Particles Deep Inside Earth's Magnetosphere (L <4)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both March and June at L = 2.4, a steady flux population at high energies (⪆2 MeV) is measured by the REPT instrument throughout the study. This is indicative of a stable population in this region, such as stably trapped high‐energy (>100 MeV) protons which have a long lifespan in this region and can penetrate the detector shielding and masquerading as electrons (e.g., Li et al., 2021; Selesnick & Albert, 2019). These proton dynamics are not modulated by individual storm events (e.g., Li et al., 2015, Schultz & Lanzerotti, 1974; Selesnick & Albert, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both March and June at L = 2.4, a steady flux population at high energies (⪆2 MeV) is measured by the REPT instrument throughout the study. This is indicative of a stable population in this region, such as stably trapped high‐energy (>100 MeV) protons which have a long lifespan in this region and can penetrate the detector shielding and masquerading as electrons (e.g., Li et al., 2021; Selesnick & Albert, 2019). These proton dynamics are not modulated by individual storm events (e.g., Li et al., 2015, Schultz & Lanzerotti, 1974; Selesnick & Albert, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 demonstrates variations of radiation belt electrons across a wide range in energy: 0.25–6 MeV and L : 1–7. Some of these features have been reported before in different formats, such as energy‐dependent deep penetration of electrons in which very few multi‐MeV electrons were observed below L = 2.6 (Baker et al., 2014; Hogan et al., 2021; X. Li, Baker, et al., 2017; X. Li et al., 1993, 2021; O’Brien et al., 2023; Zhao & Li, 2013a) while less energetic (∼1 MeV) electrons are often seen penetrating into the slot region and sometimes even into the inner belt ( L < 2) (Baker et al., 2004; Claudepierre et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2016; Zhao & Li, 2013b; Zhao et al., 2023; Zheng et al., 2006). Dispersionless injections have mostly been studied using observations near the equatorial plane (Gabrielse et al., 2016; X. Li et al., 1998; Sarris et al., 2002).…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In addition to the lower extension of the atmosphere during solar minimum, the slow increase of radiation belt proton fluxes from 2014 to 2019 may also be influenced by CRAND (Selesnick et al., 2014). The most energetic particles of the galactic cosmic rays (GCR) interact with neutral atoms in the upper atmosphere and produce energetic albedo neutrons which decay into protons, electrons, and antineutrinos (Li et al., 2021). Because they are electrically charged, some of these electrons and protons become geomagnetically trapped at low altitude in the inner belt region.…”
Section: Evolution Of Proton Fluxes In the Saa With The Solar Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCR are more intense during the quiet period of 2018 and 2019, so that this source mainly explains the increase of the fluxes. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the flux variation is much greater than the solar cycle variation of atmospheric neutrons that are the source of these trapped protons (Li et al., 2021), so that effects of the terrestrial atmosphere seem to dominate in the solar cycle modulation at low altitude.…”
Section: Evolution Of Proton Fluxes In the Saa With The Solar Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%