2004
DOI: 10.1785/012002214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source Parameter Scaling for Small Earthquakes Observed at the Western Nagano 800-m-Deep Borehole, Central Japan

Abstract: Source parameters of 68 small earthquakes (0.6 Ͻ M W Ͻ 3.0) in western Nagano, Japan, are investigated to determine the scaling of static stress drop (Dr s ) and apparent stress (r a ) with seismic moment (M 0 ). Data from the 800-m-deep borehole in the area provides clean recordings containing a wide range of frequencies. Source parameters are determined by manipulation of P and S spectra in the frequency domain using individually determined time window lengths for arrivals on each seismogram. Frequency-indep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
30
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present understanding of earthquake source scaling has divided the seismologists into two groups. One group believes a constantly scaled energy (=E R /M o ) (Ide and Beroza 2001;Ide et al 2003;Pérez-Campos and Beroza 2001;Choy and Boatwright 1995;McGarr 1999;Prieto et al 2004), while other group advocates that radiated energy increases with M o (Abercrombie 1995;Kanamori et al 1993;Mayeda and Walter 1996;Prejean and Ellsworth 2001;Richardson and Jordan 2002;Mori et al 2003;Mayeda et al 2005;Stork and Ito 2004). In this paper, we have made an attempt to obtain stable and reliable scaling relationships of earthquake source parameter estimates for small to moderate earthquakes occurring in Kachchh, Gujarat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The present understanding of earthquake source scaling has divided the seismologists into two groups. One group believes a constantly scaled energy (=E R /M o ) (Ide and Beroza 2001;Ide et al 2003;Pérez-Campos and Beroza 2001;Choy and Boatwright 1995;McGarr 1999;Prieto et al 2004), while other group advocates that radiated energy increases with M o (Abercrombie 1995;Kanamori et al 1993;Mayeda and Walter 1996;Prejean and Ellsworth 2001;Richardson and Jordan 2002;Mori et al 2003;Mayeda et al 2005;Stork and Ito 2004). In this paper, we have made an attempt to obtain stable and reliable scaling relationships of earthquake source parameter estimates for small to moderate earthquakes occurring in Kachchh, Gujarat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Allmann & Shearer 2009;Duputel et al 2013), it has also been a subject of debate, especially for small earthquakes (Abercrombie 1995;Ide et al 2004;Stork & Ito 2004;Oye et al 2005;Venkataraman et al 2006;Yamada et al 2007). Conventionally, the source duration of an event is determined from the spectral corner frequency by considering a frequency-dependent (Stork & Ito 2004;Oye et al 2005) or frequency-independent Q-model to remove path effects. It has been suggested that incomplete removal of path effects and an inappropriate instrumental bandwidth affect observed scaling relations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Kinoshita (1994) demonstrated that 1/Q S ( f ) decreases with frequency as f −0.7 /130. Recently, Kinoshita (2008) and Stork and Ito (2004) found that Q S is larger than or equal to Q P , confirming the tomography results by Hauksson and Shearer (2006). Although Q P is usually larger than Q S because shear motion is more dissipated, there are reports of Q P lower than Q S (Hauksson and Shearer, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%