2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4605-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source–receptor matrix calculation for deposited mass with the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART v10.2 in backward mode

Abstract: Abstract. Existing Lagrangian particle dispersion models are capable of establishing source-receptor relationships by running either forward or backward in time. For receptororiented studies such as interpretation of "point" measurement data, backward simulations can be computationally more efficient by several orders of magnitude. However, to date, the backward modelling capabilities have been limited to atmospheric concentrations or mixing ratios. In this paper, we extend the backward modelling technique to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bond et al (2004) estimate the uncertainty in BC emission inventories to be a factor of about 2. Flanner et al (2007) conclude that for the climate forcing by BC in snow, the emissions introduce a bigger uncertainty than the scavenging by snowmelt water and snow aging. However, the quality of emission inventories is difficult to assess with models because of the dependence on the model (Vignati et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bond et al (2004) estimate the uncertainty in BC emission inventories to be a factor of about 2. Flanner et al (2007) conclude that for the climate forcing by BC in snow, the emissions introduce a bigger uncertainty than the scavenging by snowmelt water and snow aging. However, the quality of emission inventories is difficult to assess with models because of the dependence on the model (Vignati et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The aerosol transport and radiation simulations in this study consider the reduction of snow albedo due to deposited BC. The BC-in-snow albedo effect is parameterized in terms of a lookup table based on a single-layer version of the Snow, Ice and Aerosol Radiation (SNICAR) model from Flanner et al (2007). The scheme was first implemented in the earthsystem model version of ECHAM6 by Engels (2016) and has become available recently in ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 (Gilgen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Calculation Of Direct Aerosol Radiative Effects Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also measurements of deposition on the ground, e.g., in precipitation samples or ice cores, and for this type of measurement no backward simulations were possible until recently. Therefore, Eckhardt et al (2017) introduced the option to calculate SRR values in backward mode also for wet and dry deposition, and a first application to ice core data was presented by McConnell et al (2018). It is anticipated that quantitative interpretation of ice core data will be a major application of the new backward mode, which is efficient enough to allow for the calculation of, for example, 100 years of seasonally resolved deposition data in less than 24 h of computation time.…”
Section: Source-receptor Matrix Calculation Of Deposited Mass Backwarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For forward runs, additional files grid_pptv_date_nnn can be created (setting IOUT to values of 2 or 3), which contain data such as volume mixing ratios (requires molar weight in SPECIES_nnn file). Source-receptor relationships (i.e., emission sensitivities) in backward mode for atmospheric receptors are written out in grid_time_date_nnn files; those for deposited mass are recorded in files grid_wetdep_date_nnn and grid_drydep_date_nnn (see Seibert and Frank (2004), Eckhardt et al (2017), Sect. 2.5, and Table 12 for output units).…”
Section: Namementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All released particles represent a unity deposition amount, which was converted immediately (i.e. upon release of a particle) to atmospheric concentrations using the deposition intensity as characterized by either dry deposition velocity or scavenging rate (for further details, see Eckhardt et al, 2017). The concentrations were subsequently treated as in normal "concentration mode" backward tracking (Seibert and Frank, 2004) to establish source-receptor relationships between the emissions and deposition amounts.…”
Section: Emissions and Modelling Of Black Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%