2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.850412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source separation using sparse-solution linear solvers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work presented in (Miller et al, 2010) reports promising results in this direction found using harmony search, a method in which "trials" with a preset number of sources are sequentially generated -either afresh or by making slight changes to existing configurations -and accepted or discarded depending on their "success" -i.e., the closeness of their predictions to measured values. The authors manage to properly resolve multi-target data taken with TEMTADS at the Blossom Point Army Research Facility in Maryland and at APG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work presented in (Miller et al, 2010) reports promising results in this direction found using harmony search, a method in which "trials" with a preset number of sources are sequentially generated -either afresh or by making slight changes to existing configurations -and accepted or discarded depending on their "success" -i.e., the closeness of their predictions to measured values. The authors manage to properly resolve multi-target data taken with TEMTADS at the Blossom Point Army Research Facility in Maryland and at APG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The method we propose here is fundamentally different in that it is not stochastic. As in (Miller et al, 2010), we (a) seed the region below the surface with a distribution of point dipoles, each of which contributes to the measured magnetic field, and (b) iteratively update the dipoles' polarizabilities -that is, their dipole moments but dividing out the primary field that induces them-so as to minimize the mismatch between computed and measured fields over a grid, but here the similarities end. Instead of looking for the minimum sufficient number of sources, we look for the sources that have the most influence on the measured data and iteratively "zoom in" on them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our discrimination approach uses a model-based estimation procedure to determine whether or not an unknown target is likely to be a UXO item. It entails estimating the size and shape of the target from the spatial pattern of the induced field above the target [3,4,5]. The EMI signal is a linear function of the flux through the receiving coil.…”
Section: Bparameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately extract polarization tensor parameters from the EMI response, we need reasonably accurate estimates of the location of the source. We also need to decide if the observed anomaly is due to a single object or two or more objects (Bell, 2006;Grzegorczyk et al, 2009;Song et al, 2009;Miller et al, 2010;Shubitidze et al, 2010;Song et al, 2011). Recent advances in EMI instrumentation have produced systems that are able to acquire multistatic/multicomponent data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%