2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source tracking using microbial community fingerprints: Method comparison with hydrodynamic modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both computational and in vitro experiments were performed to test the accuracy of the qualitative and quantitative predictions generated by SourceTracker, and a previous study found that source predictions for fecal pollution from sources present at high abundance were relatively accurate (Henry et al, 2016). The calculation of the relative standard deviation (RSD) among several runs has been used as a gauge by which to measure confidence (Brown et al, 2017;Henry et al, 2016;McCarthy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sourcetrackermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both computational and in vitro experiments were performed to test the accuracy of the qualitative and quantitative predictions generated by SourceTracker, and a previous study found that source predictions for fecal pollution from sources present at high abundance were relatively accurate (Henry et al, 2016). The calculation of the relative standard deviation (RSD) among several runs has been used as a gauge by which to measure confidence (Brown et al, 2017;Henry et al, 2016;McCarthy et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sourcetrackermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SourceTracker algorithm has been shown to be more accurate than random forest analysis, or naive Bayesian classification (Knights et al, 2011). SourceTracker has been used to determine contamination sources in the Russian River (Dubinsky et al, 2016), ATM keypads (Bik et al, 2016), recreational beaches in Australia (Ahmed et al, 2015; Brown et al, 2017; Henry et al, 2016; McCarthy et al, 2017), lakes in St. Paul, Minnesota (Brown et al, 2019), and the upper Mississippi River (Staley et al, 2015, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing reliance on models and forecasts for planning and decision-making for effective management of drinking water facilities [38][39][40]. Among the variety of models, properly calibrated hydrodynamic and water quality models provide reliable means of tracking primary sources of microbial contamination in drinking water sources [41][42][43]. In addition, these models can describe the transport of contaminants within watershed and their fate once in the waterbody [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%