1989
DOI: 10.1029/jb094ib01p00765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor

Abstract: Seismic signals provide information about the underlying moment tensor which, in turn, may be interpreted in terms of source mechanism. This paper is concerned with a two-dimensional graphical display of all possible relative sizes of the three principal moments; it provides a method of representing the probability density of these relative sizes deduced from a given set of data. Information provided by such a display, together with that relating to the orientation of the principal moments, provides as full a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
216
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Hudson et al (1989) we visualize the nature of the calculated moment tensors using source-type plots. These equal-area plots are a means to illustrate how strong the isotropic component is (k parameter, near-horizontal lines) and how much the deviatoric component differs from a pure double couple (T parameter, near-vertical lines).…”
Section: Source Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Hudson et al (1989) we visualize the nature of the calculated moment tensors using source-type plots. These equal-area plots are a means to illustrate how strong the isotropic component is (k parameter, near-horizontal lines) and how much the deviatoric component differs from a pure double couple (T parameter, near-vertical lines).…”
Section: Source Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equal-area plots are a means to illustrate how strong the isotropic component is (k parameter, near-horizontal lines) and how much the deviatoric component differs from a pure double couple (T parameter, near-vertical lines). Ⓔ More information on source-type plots is given in Background Information on Moment Tensor Inversions and Grid for Source-Type Plots after Hudson et al (1989) in the electronic edition of BSSA.…”
Section: Source Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source-type parameters (Hudson et al, 1989) are calculated for each synthetic source ( Figure S1b). Since the source-type plot does not account for total seismic moment (only relative moment) or source orientation, a single set of source-type parameters (one point on the sourcetype plot) can represent several sources.…”
Section: Bssa Short Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanism distribution is plotted with a Riedesel and Jordan (1989) plot, which is also the preference of many of the previously mentioned studies. In the following study we will employ the source-type plot from Hudson et al (1989), which is described in Ford et al (2009). Further details of the inversion method and its practical implementation are also given in Ford et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decomposition was further developed and applied by Sipkin (1986), Jost and Herrmann (1989), Hudson et al (1989), Kuge and Lay (1994), Vavryčuk (2001Vavryčuk ( , 2005Vavryčuk ( , 2011 and others. Furthermore, Hudson et al (1989) and Riedesel and Jordan (1989) proposed graphical representations of the DC and non-DC components in order to identify visually the most appropriate physical source corresponding to the retrieved moment tensor (for a geometric comparison of both approaches, see Tape and Tape 2012b).Since an increasing quantity and quality of seismic data allow inverting for accurate moment tensors and interpreting the details of the source process, an efficient and physically reasonable decomposition of moment tensors is necessary. This has recently motivated several authors to revisit the existing decompositions (Chapman and Leaney 2012; Zhu and Ben-Zion 2013) and sourcetype plots (Chapman and Leaney 2012; Tape and Tape 2012a, b) and to develop their modifications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%