Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that authoritarian regimes are responsive to societal actors, but our understanding of the sources of authoritarian responsiveness remains limited because of the challenges of measurement and causal identification. By conducting an online field experiment among 2,103 Chinese counties, we examine factors that affect officials' incentives to respond to citizens in an authoritarian context. At baseline, we find that approximately one‐third of county governments respond to citizen demands expressed online. Threats of collective action and threats of tattling to upper levels of government cause county governments to be considerably more responsive, whereas identifying as loyal, long‐standing members of the Chinese Communist Party does not increase responsiveness. Moreover, we find that threats of collective action make local officials more publicly responsive. Together, these results demonstrate that top‐down mechanisms of oversight as well as bottom‐up societal pressures are possible sources of authoritarian responsiveness.

Elite Capture

“…67 this is broadly consistent with the idea that traditional kinship institutions can help buttress public goods provision, which occurs in a context of repeated interaction 62 lorentzen 2014; Chen, pan, and Xu 2015;Distelhorst 2015. 63 See lü 2014, Wang 2014, Birney 2014, and Fu 2016 a second parallel is with other types of brokers in the developing world.…”

Bridging critical institutionalism and fragmented authoritarianism in China: An analysis of centralized water policies and their local implementation in semi‐arid irrigation districts

“…The frameworks of responsive authoritarianism (Grabosky ; Chen et al . ) and consultative authoritarianism (He & Thogersen ; Teets ) have been developed to analyze policy innovations, institutional reforms, and polycentricism in China, which are presumed to be excluded from authoritarian regimes. The dynamics of fragmented authoritarianism, along with the emergence of local institutions during the process of bricolage, jointly offer a context where new organizational forms of institutions can be studied.…”

From Internet to social safety net: The policy consequences of online participation in China

“…Compared to electoral democracies, the Chinese regime may be even more dependent on information conveyed through channels such as the Internet because of the underdevelopment of more conventional democratic institutions. Moreover, responsiveness may also be driven by officials' fear of citizens' collective actions (Chen et al, ). To the extent that online grievances are important signals of mass dissatisfaction, authorities may be motivated to make substantive policy concessions in response to these grievances as a way to preempt more disruptive offline actions.…”