2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of bovine tuberculosis in the United States

Abstract: a b s t r a c tDespite control and eradication efforts, bovine tuberculosis continues to be identified at low levels among cattle in the United States. We evaluated possible external sources of infection by characterizing the genetic relatedness of bovine tuberculosis from a national database of reported infections, comparing strains circulating among US cattle with those of imported cattle, and farmed and wild cervids.Farmed cervids maintained a genetically distinct Mycobacterium bovis strain, and cattle occa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most predominant spoligotype pattern found in Morocco is SB0121, belonging to the family BOV 1, this spoligopattern was already reported in Algeria [ 41 ], in Tunisia [ 42 ] and in Spain [ 43 ]. The second most frequent spoligotype was SB0265 which was reported as the second most frequent in the United States from a set of strains collected between 1989 and 2013 [ 44 ], in addition, this spoligotype was isolated in Tunisia from a strain coming from Morocco [ 33 ], and was also reported in many European countries [ 45 , 46 ], as well as in Taiwan [ 47 ]. The spoligopattern SB0120 had the frequency of 11.7% in our sample size and was reported previously in France from a sample originating from Morocco (SITVIT database), it was also reported in many African countries like Algeria [ 41 ], Tunisia [ 42 ] and Zambia [ 48 ] as well as in Argentina and Spain [ 43 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most predominant spoligotype pattern found in Morocco is SB0121, belonging to the family BOV 1, this spoligopattern was already reported in Algeria [ 41 ], in Tunisia [ 42 ] and in Spain [ 43 ]. The second most frequent spoligotype was SB0265 which was reported as the second most frequent in the United States from a set of strains collected between 1989 and 2013 [ 44 ], in addition, this spoligotype was isolated in Tunisia from a strain coming from Morocco [ 33 ], and was also reported in many European countries [ 45 , 46 ], as well as in Taiwan [ 47 ]. The spoligopattern SB0120 had the frequency of 11.7% in our sample size and was reported previously in France from a sample originating from Morocco (SITVIT database), it was also reported in many African countries like Algeria [ 41 ], Tunisia [ 42 ] and Zambia [ 48 ] as well as in Argentina and Spain [ 43 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet these modelling results suggest otherwise, and predict that herd breakdowns should be expected to continue until bTB prevalence in deer in is maintained below ~0.1%. Currently, genetic lines of evidence also argue against the involvement of wildlife other than deer in transmission of bTB to Michigan cattle (Tsao et al, 2014;Salvador et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycobacterium bovis isolates were obtained from naturally infected wildlife (deer and elk) and livestock (cattle) tissue samples using standard isolation protocols (Parish & Stocker, ). Wildlife management information, surveillance methods used to find infected free‐ranging wildlife (through hunting and out‐of‐season shooting permits), and hunting territories (from where the data were collected) are described in Text and elsewhere (O'Brien et al, , , ; MDNR1, ; MDNR2, ), as are the origin of cattle isolates (Tsao et al, ). Because we are focusing on the potential role of elk in the transmission of bTB amongst the three species, bTB‐positive deer that were spatially (within 10 miles of the sampling location of an elk) and temporally (within three years before or after the sampled elk date) close to each positive elk were selected for inclusion from among the available archived isolates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%