2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123402000066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
322
2
30

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 535 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
21
322
2
30
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, Moriconi and Carvalho (2016) argue that the importance of economic factors is highly correlated only in socially vulnerable layers of the population. Based on the obtained values of total relevancy of factors underlying corrupt behaviour in the public sector we can say that in fi rst place are the factors underlying corrupt behaviour that operate at an informal level and emanate from the jurisdiction and police environments (which is confi rmed in a study by Montinola and Jackman 2002). Marques (2010) complements our conclusions and argues that corrupt behaviour in the public sector is also infl uenced by the high levels of impunity, when citizens see how members of diff erent elites are not punished aft er being denounced for corruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, Moriconi and Carvalho (2016) argue that the importance of economic factors is highly correlated only in socially vulnerable layers of the population. Based on the obtained values of total relevancy of factors underlying corrupt behaviour in the public sector we can say that in fi rst place are the factors underlying corrupt behaviour that operate at an informal level and emanate from the jurisdiction and police environments (which is confi rmed in a study by Montinola and Jackman 2002). Marques (2010) complements our conclusions and argues that corrupt behaviour in the public sector is also infl uenced by the high levels of impunity, when citizens see how members of diff erent elites are not punished aft er being denounced for corruption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Correlation between the monopoly market environment and extensive state intervention regulating the environment and corruption is confi rmed by several studies (Kligaard 1998;Broadman and Recanatini 1999;Djankov et al 2002;Treisman 1999;Lambsdorff et al 2000;Ades and di Tella 1999). Another economic factor in the growth of corruption is the size of the public sector (Elliot 1997;Montinola and Jackman 2002;Graeff and Mehlkop 2003) and the low salaries of public-sector employees (Tanzi 1998;Sičáková-Beblavá and Beblavý, 2007;Ochrana and Maaytová 2012).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Defi Nitions Of Corruption Perceive Corrupmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the fact that corruption is a common practice in many countries, it would be a mistake to consider the phenomenon itself as part of the manners and customs (Tanzi, 1998;Treisman, 2000;Montinola & Jackman, 2002;Seligson, 2002;Graeff & Mehlkop, 2003;Wallace & Latcheva, 2006). …”
Section: Measures and Policies On Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El argumento que aquí se plantea es que, a medida que el poder político se encuentra compartido entre un mayor número de actores, existirían mayores probabilidades de un "buen gobierno" al interior del ejecutivo, la legislatura y las cortes (Montinola y Jackman, 2002). La idea central en este caso es que si el poder político se encuentra más fragmentado, las probabilidades de que existan diferentes intereses en los poderes del Estado es mayor, facilitando así el mutuo control y chequeo de sus acciones y desincentivando la presencia de conductas corruptas.…”
Section: Entorno Políticounclassified