1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1971.tb01635.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOURCES OF ERROR IN THE DETERMINATION OF SOIL POTASSIUM ACTIVITY RATIOS BY THE Q/I PROCEDURE

Abstract: Equilibrium activity ratios such as aK/(atJ,,+m)t may be determined by analysing a solution in equilibrium with a soil. The Q/I procedure is one method for establishing the composition of such a solution. Several approximations have been proposed to simplify this procedure or the necessary calculations. This paper reviews the main sources of error in the Q/I procedure.Errors may arise in the sampling, preparation, and storage of soil samples: it is best to analyse samples as soon as possible after sampling, wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They calculated the change in the amount of NEK by the difference between AKi-f measured at one time and AKi-f of a so-called 'instantaneous' Q/1 curve, assuming that only negligible release or fixation occurred during the short course of the 'instantaneous' Q/r experiment. Moss & Beckett (1971), however, noticed that the shaking period must not be too long so as to avoid release and that a significant fixation can occur during a period as short as 30 min. Thus, Matthews & Beckett's method can provide biased underestimated results.…”
Section: Discussion On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They calculated the change in the amount of NEK by the difference between AKi-f measured at one time and AKi-f of a so-called 'instantaneous' Q/1 curve, assuming that only negligible release or fixation occurred during the short course of the 'instantaneous' Q/r experiment. Moss & Beckett (1971), however, noticed that the shaking period must not be too long so as to avoid release and that a significant fixation can occur during a period as short as 30 min. Thus, Matthews & Beckett's method can provide biased underestimated results.…”
Section: Discussion On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The proposed calculation of the contribution of EK and NEK to the K balance of the soil-solution system is accurate as far as the choice of the initial exchangeable potassium (E,) is appropriate. Under certain conditions, as discussed by Moss & Beckett (1971), the activity ratio ARo for which neither sorption nor desorption occurs can be considered as the equilibrium activity ratio of the soil in its initial moisture state before the contact with the solution. If this is the case then the soil in its initial moisture state and the soil in equilibrium with a solution of composition ARo should have the same EK value.…”
Section: Discussion On Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(37)], and the quantity-intensity (Q/I) technique presented by Matthews and Beckett (1962) have been used mostly to describe K + cation availability in soils (Beckett, 1964;Moss and Beckett, 1971). The quantity of exchangeable K + in the soil (L\K) is plotted as a function ofthe intensity factor, or activity ratio (ARK), where ARK = aK/Jaca + aMg, and ai = activity of cation i.…”
Section: {Sb L/2 }(A+)mentioning
confidence: 99%