2015
DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-13413-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of long-lived atmospheric VOCs at the rural boreal forest site, SMEAR II

Abstract: Abstract. In this study a long-term volatile organic compound (VOCs) concentration data set, measured at the SMEAR II (Station for Measuring Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations) boreal forest site in Hyytiälä, Finland during the years 2006–2011, was analyzed in order to identify source areas and profiles of the observed VOCs. VOC mixing ratios were measured using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Four-day HYSPLIT 4 (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) backward trajectories and the Unm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this was probably related to advection from distant sources (e.g. Patokoski et al, 2015). Generally, the average acetonitrile fluxes were really small being still above the detection limits except in winter (Table 4 and Fig.…”
Section: Seasonal Behaviour Of Observed Fluxes and Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this was probably related to advection from distant sources (e.g. Patokoski et al, 2015). Generally, the average acetonitrile fluxes were really small being still above the detection limits except in winter (Table 4 and Fig.…”
Section: Seasonal Behaviour Of Observed Fluxes and Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, spectral corrections were applied. The low frequency losses for the fluxes were corrected based on theoretical corrections (Rannik and Vesala, 1999), whereas the high-frequency losses were experimentally determined. Finally, the 30 min fluxes were quality checked for stationarity with a limit of 0.3 (Foken and Wichura, 1996), and the periods with u * < 0.2 m s −1 were removed from further analysis.…”
Section: Ancillary Measurements and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other evident nearby sources of anthropogenic pollution are the town of Orivesi (population approximately 9 200) 19 km south of SMEAR II and the nearby village of Korkeakoski with two saw mills and a pellet factory 6-7 km to the south east from SMEAR II (Liao et al, 2011;Äijälä et al, 2017). Nonetheless, the dominating source of air pollutants are air masses advected from industrialized areas over southern Finland, St. Petersburg region in Russia and continental Europe (Kulmala et al, 2000;Patokoski et al, 2015;Riuttanen et al, 2013). The anthropogenic emissions are minor at the station.…”
Section: Smear II Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%