1987
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(87)90055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of sampling bias in enclosure fish trapping: Effects on estimates of density and diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kushlan 1981, Huh 1984, Erwin e t al. 1985, Kushlan et al 1986, Sogard et al 1987, 1989, Holmquist et al 1989a and have been shown to be h~g h l y efficient, relative to other collecting devices, for quantitatively sampling demersal organisms in vegetated habitats (Kushlan 1981, Freeman et al 1984, Jacobsen & Kushlan 1987, Rozas & Minello 1997. Throw trapping of well-separated stations is effectively sampling w~t h replacement (Jacobsen & Kushlan 1987), and re-sampling seagrass-covered sites at 6 mo Intervals over a period of 4 yr does not cause shifts in measures of seagrass cover or assemblages of mobile fauna (Holmquist unpubl.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kushlan 1981, Huh 1984, Erwin e t al. 1985, Kushlan et al 1986, Sogard et al 1987, 1989, Holmquist et al 1989a and have been shown to be h~g h l y efficient, relative to other collecting devices, for quantitatively sampling demersal organisms in vegetated habitats (Kushlan 1981, Freeman et al 1984, Jacobsen & Kushlan 1987, Rozas & Minello 1997. Throw trapping of well-separated stations is effectively sampling w~t h replacement (Jacobsen & Kushlan 1987), and re-sampling seagrass-covered sites at 6 mo Intervals over a period of 4 yr does not cause shifts in measures of seagrass cover or assemblages of mobile fauna (Holmquist unpubl.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enclosure traps, including drop-traps (Kahl 1963;Kushlan 1974;Gilmore et al 1978;Pihl and Rosenberg 1982;Pihl Baden and Pihl 1984;Nellbring 1985), drop-nets (Hellier 1958;Mosely and Copeland 1969;Kjelson et al 1975;Adams 1976), buoyant pop-nets (Larson et al 1986;Serafy et al 1988;Dewey et al 1989;Connolly 1994), lift-nets (Higer and Kolipinski 1967;Rozas 1992), and throw-traps (Kushlan 1981;Jacobsen and Kushlan 1987;Chick et al 1992;Jordan et al 1997), provide instantaneous samples and are considered to be the most efficient sampling devices for small fishes and invertebrates in shallowwater habitats less than 1.5 m deep (Kushlan 1981;Jordan et al 1997). But only a few complex and labor-intensive buoyant drop-and pop-nets with floating frames are usable at depths of 2 to 5 m (Mosely and Copeland 1969;Larson et al 1986;Serafy et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traps that rapidly enclose a clearly defined area have been increasingly used to sample fish populations in shallow-water habitats because they are a precise and accurate means to obtain quantitative estimates of fish assemblage abundance and biomass in vegetated habitats (Kushlan 1981;Jacobsen and Kushlan 1987;Jordan et al 1997). The absolute efficiency of drop traps can be estimated in shallow block net separated areas with known fish densities (Kushlan 1981;Jordan et al 1997), and they have often been used to estimate the relative efficiency of seines and trawls (Freeman et al 1984;Dewey et al 1989;Wennhage et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fish trapping can underestimate fish densities (Jacobsen and Kushlan 1989) and result in selective sampling of communities (Ovegard et al 2011), while baited remote underwater video surveillance can attract greater numbers of predatory and scavenging species (Harvey 2007) and converting counts to density data can be difficult (Miller and Hunte 1987). Using the same technique in different habitats or times of the year, however, facilitates insights into relative abundance and distribution providing the particular method employed is not biased by the differences presented by contrasting habitats or seasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple techniques are used to investigate fish abundance and distribution, including seining, trawling, fish trapping, visual census and underwater video surveillance (Munro 1974, Jacobsen and Kushlan 1989, Collins 1990, Travers and Potter 2002, Edgar et al 2004, Harvey et al 2007), all of which have their own biases. For example, fish trapping can underestimate fish densities (Jacobsen and Kushlan 1989) and result in selective sampling of communities (Ovegard et al 2011), while baited remote underwater video surveillance can attract greater numbers of predatory and scavenging species (Harvey 2007) and converting counts to density data can be difficult (Miller and Hunte 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%