2013
DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of Social Support: Examining Congregational Involvement, Private Devotional Activities, and Congregational Context

Abstract: Previous studies examining the relationship between religion and providing social support have claimed that religious involvement and social networks explain the higher levels of social support among religious Americans. By limiting its focus to attenders of religious congregations, this study seeks to understand if private devotional activities and congregational context also matter for predicting the provision of social support in a highly religious sample. Utilizing a sample of attenders and their congregat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The establishment of social ties is relatively common across religious identities, even between the religious and nonreligious (Olson and Perl 2011; Vargas and Loveland 2011); however, the extent to which social support extends beyond these boundaries remains unsettled. Merino (2014) argues that social support is more common among intrafaith ties, although this distinction may be driven by conservative theological beliefs, including those focused on themes of exclusivity (Blanchard et al 2008; McClure 2013; Scheitle and Adamczyk 2009). In contrast, while some religionists are likely to assist like-minded coreligionists, they do offer support to individuals holding varied religious beliefs (Schafer 2015).…”
Section: Empirical and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The establishment of social ties is relatively common across religious identities, even between the religious and nonreligious (Olson and Perl 2011; Vargas and Loveland 2011); however, the extent to which social support extends beyond these boundaries remains unsettled. Merino (2014) argues that social support is more common among intrafaith ties, although this distinction may be driven by conservative theological beliefs, including those focused on themes of exclusivity (Blanchard et al 2008; McClure 2013; Scheitle and Adamczyk 2009). In contrast, while some religionists are likely to assist like-minded coreligionists, they do offer support to individuals holding varied religious beliefs (Schafer 2015).…”
Section: Empirical and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social relationships have a notable positive impact on physical and mental health, and a great deal of research has been devoted to the underlying mechanisms (Umberson and Montez, 2010). Here, sociologists of religion have an important role in linking religious involvement to health and well-being, since religion plays an important role in individuals’ social embeddedness and social integration, providing for many a crucial source of both strong and weak social ties (McClure, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sizeable body of research has been dedicated to understanding the underlying mechanisms between social networks and well‐being (e.g., Berkman and Glass 2000; Smith and Christakis 2008; Umberson and Montez 2010). Social networks may play a role in linking religion to mental health (McClure 2013; Rote, Hill, and Ellison 2013), but the exact characteristics of network ties have largely been absent in the previous work. Using egocentric network data, this study indicates that various dimensions of network members’ religiosity—shared religious tradition, discussion of religious matters, and receipt of prayer support—have implications for mental health, and whether these associations are contingent on respondents’ own religiosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%