1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of variation in floral nectar production rate in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): implications for natural selection

Abstract: Sources of variation in floral nectar production were investigated in a natural population of Epilobium canum (Onagraceae), a hummingbird-pollinated herbaceous shrub. Field measurements showed significant phenotypic variation among plants in floral nectar production rates. Average variance among flowers within plants was approximately one-third to one-half as great as variance among plants, with coefficients of variation among flowers ranging from 6.5% to 116.7%. A greenhouse experiment using clonally propagat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that nectar traits have received relatively little attention in the past due to their notorious variation with environmental conditions such as water and nutrient availability (Real and Rathcke 1991, Wyatt et al 1992, Boose 1997. Although some studies have found heritable variation in nectar production (reviewed by Mitchell (2004), this Special Feature), it is possible that in many instances selection on nectar production will not result in evolutionary change, due to high environmental variability.…”
Section: Does Nectar Increase Herbivory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that nectar traits have received relatively little attention in the past due to their notorious variation with environmental conditions such as water and nutrient availability (Real and Rathcke 1991, Wyatt et al 1992, Boose 1997. Although some studies have found heritable variation in nectar production (reviewed by Mitchell (2004), this Special Feature), it is possible that in many instances selection on nectar production will not result in evolutionary change, due to high environmental variability.…”
Section: Does Nectar Increase Herbivory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, differential nectar production rates among flowers on the same plant are commonly observed (e.g. Cruden et al 1983;Boose 1997;Cresswell 1998;McDade & Weeks 2004). Notable examples include species that produce more nectar during either the male or female floral phase of dichogamous flowers, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceci rejoint le fait que l'activité photosynthétique des plantes diminue en situation de déficit hydrique (Chaves et al, 2009), comme en situation d'excès hydrique (Balakhnina, 2015). Leiss et Klinkhamer (2005) ont quant à eux montré, à l'instar de Boose (1997), l'existence d'une interaction génotype-environnement sur la sécrétion nectarifère : l'effet positif de l'humidité du sol sur la sécrétion chez la vipérine commune (Echium vulgare) s'observe surtout pour des génotypes peu nectarifères avec un système racinaire peu développé. À l'inverse, des génotypes très nectarifères avec un système racinaire bien développé ont une forte capacité de sécrétion en condition de sol sec comme en condition de sol humide.…”
Section: Humidité Du Solunclassified