. (2013) 'The Vikings were not the rst colonizers of the Faroe Islands.', Quaternary science reviews., 77 . pp. 228-232. Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.011Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Quaternary science reviews. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re ected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A de nitive version was subsequently published in Quaternary science reviews, 77, 1 October 2014, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.06.011.
Additional information:Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:⢠a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source ⢠a link is made to the metadata record in DRO ⢠the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
AbstractWe report on the earliest archaeological evidence from the Faroe Islands, placing human colonization in the 4 th -6 th centuries AD, at least 300-500 years earlier than previously demonstrated archaeologically. The evidence consists of an extensive wind-blown sand deposit containing patches of burnt peat ash of anthropogenic origin. Samples of carbonised barley grains from two of these ash patches produced 14 C dates of two pre-Viking phases within the 4 th -6 th and late 6 th -8 th centuries AD. A re-evaluation is required of the nature, scale and timing of the human colonization of the Faroes and the wider North Atlantic region.