2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sourcing the sand: Accessory mineral fertility, analytical and other biases in detrital U-Pb provenance analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several provenance studies have highlighted how the relative abundance of provenance proxy minerals in bedrock sources, i.e., mineral fertility, may influence the detrital cargo (Chew et al., 2020; Dickinson, 2008; Flowerdew et al., 2019; Moecher & Samson, 2006; Spencer et al., 2018). In previous provenance studies of the Yangtze River, the abundance of zircon in different tributaries was assumed constant (He et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several provenance studies have highlighted how the relative abundance of provenance proxy minerals in bedrock sources, i.e., mineral fertility, may influence the detrital cargo (Chew et al., 2020; Dickinson, 2008; Flowerdew et al., 2019; Moecher & Samson, 2006; Spencer et al., 2018). In previous provenance studies of the Yangtze River, the abundance of zircon in different tributaries was assumed constant (He et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, accessory minerals such as zircon, which is much more widely used in provenance studies (e.g., Fedo et al., 2003; Flowerdew et al., 2019; Moecher & Samson, 2006), makes up only 0.02 ± 0.02% of the detritus (Vezzoli et al., 2016). Variable accessory mineral fertility in the source region can be a major cause of bias in sediment budget evaluation (Chew et al., 2020; Dickinson, 2008; Malusà et al., 2016; Moecher & Samson, 2006). Hence, detrital K‐feldspar is more representative of the sourcelands and thus has greater potential to document the sediment supply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RuZi variations could thus be explained by changes in supply from a previously unidentified rutile‐rich, apatite/zircon poor source rock that is not captured or is significantly underrepresented in zircon and apatite geochronology. Zircon geochronology tends to be biased towards felsic igneous rocks, not detecting magma poor orogenies (Chew et al, 2020; O'Sullivan et al, 2016). Rutile is common in a range of rock‐types and especially abundant in high pressure, low temperature subduction metamorphic rocks (Chew et al, 2020; Meinhold, 2010; O'Sullivan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zircon geochronology tends to be biased towards felsic igneous rocks, not detecting magma poor orogenies (Chew et al, 2020; O'Sullivan et al, 2016). Rutile is common in a range of rock‐types and especially abundant in high pressure, low temperature subduction metamorphic rocks (Chew et al, 2020; Meinhold, 2010; O'Sullivan et al, 2016). Previously reported apatite trace element data from sandstones from the Tullig Cyclothem highlight a source mainly from I‐type granitoids and mafic igneous rocks, with undateable grains derived from low‐grade and medium‐grade metamorphic rocks and some grains from high‐grade metamorphic rocks and S‐type granitoids (Nauton‐Fourteu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation