Chemical looping
combustion (CLC) is a novel carbon capture and
storage technology that can be used in the proper disposal of municipal
solid waste when used as a solid fuel. In this study, the results
of the CLC of paper, plastics, and paper/plastic blends were compared
with CLC of South African coal using Chemcad software. The simulation
was done for two different CLC processes, namely, chemical looping
oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) and in situ gasification CLC (IG-CLC). The
results demonstrated that coal at 66% had a lower CO
2
yield
than paper (86%) but a higher yield than all the plastic samples in
CLOU (3356%) and an equal CO
2
yield in paper and all plastic
samples in IG-CLC. Furthermore, coal had a lower CO
2
gas
yield than all the optimum blends (72–85%) for CLOU and an
equal yield with the entire paper/plastic blend in IG-CLC. On combustion
efficiency, coal has a lower combustion efficiency at 80% than paper
and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) at 90 and 96%, respectively, but a higher
efficiency than other plastic samples that are between 30 and 70%
in CLOU while in IG-CLC, it had a lower efficiency than paper, PVC,
and polyethylene terephthalate and higher efficiency than high-density
polyethylene, low-density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene.
For paper/plastic blends, coal has higher combustion efficiency than
all the paper/plastic blends in both CLOU and IG-CLC processes except
for the paper/PVC where the combustion efficiency was higher than
coal.