2007
DOI: 10.1080/03057070701475575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

South African Debates on the Basic Income Grant: Wage Labour and the Post-Apartheid Social Policy*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Yet these lines of argument lie side by side with others, which are markedly different from social democratic reasoning, and surprisingly similar to the neoliberal rationality that we more usually associate with antiwelfare discourses. The intermingling of these different themes speaks to the complex political struggles around the BIG, which have been discussed by others (eg Mattisonn and Seekings 2003;Barchiesi 2007). My interest here, though, is not in analyzing these politics, but in identifying some surprising ways in which certain discursive "moves" that we can readily identify as neoliberal are being put to work in the service of apparently pro-poor and pro-welfare political arguments.…”
Section: Basic Incomementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Yet these lines of argument lie side by side with others, which are markedly different from social democratic reasoning, and surprisingly similar to the neoliberal rationality that we more usually associate with antiwelfare discourses. The intermingling of these different themes speaks to the complex political struggles around the BIG, which have been discussed by others (eg Mattisonn and Seekings 2003;Barchiesi 2007). My interest here, though, is not in analyzing these politics, but in identifying some surprising ways in which certain discursive "moves" that we can readily identify as neoliberal are being put to work in the service of apparently pro-poor and pro-welfare political arguments.…”
Section: Basic Incomementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Endnotes 1 I refer here to the remarkable PhD research now being carried out by Ramah McKay (Department of Anthropology, Stanford University). 2 Barchiesi (2007) gives a detailed and illuminating account of the origins of the BIG campaign and the Taylor Committee report. 3 As Barchiesi (2007) noted, some more conservative formulations of the BIG campaign have also made the contrary argument, that it would help move unemployed people into very low wage jobs.…”
Section: The Point Is To Change It!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Yet these lines of argument lie side by side with others, which are markedly different from social democratic reasoning, and surprisingly similar to the neoliberal reasoning that we usually associate with antiwelfare discourses. The intermingling of these different themes speaks to the complex political struggles around the BIG, which have been discussed, for example, by Matisonn and Seekings (2003) and Barchiesi (2006). But my interest here is not in analyzing these politics, but in identifying some surprising ways in which certain discursive "moves" that we can readily identify as neoliberal are being put to work in the service of pro-poor and pro-welfare political arguments.…”
Section: The Basic Income Grant Campaignmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A large informal sector and the blurring boundary between working and not working, as well as the need to combine labour income with social transfers and improve the bargaining power of the most precarious workers are even more topical in low and middle-income countries than they are in the developed welfare states. 5 Some seminal discussions have been seen in South Africa (Seekings & Matisonn, 2012;Barchiesi, 2008) and Brazil (Matarazzo Suplicy, 2002). The discussion on India will be referred to in the discussion chapter.…”
Section: Basic Income As Social Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Some seminal discussions have been seen in South Africa (Seekings & Matisonn, ; Barchiesi, ) and Brazil (Matarazzo Suplicy, ). The discussion on India will be referred to in the discussion chapter. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%