2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

South Atlantic Forced Multidecadal Teleconnection to the Midlatitude South Indian Ocean

Abstract: Sea surface temperature (SST) in the midlatitude south Indian Ocean (MSIO) exhibits prominent multidecadal fluctuations that have profound climate impacts for regions around the Indian Ocean. Observational analysis suggests that these multidecadal fluctuations can be explained by remote forcing from South Atlantic multidecadal variability. A suite of Atlantic Pacemaker experiments performs well in reproducing the observed MSIO SST multidecadal variation and its association with the South Atlantic. This transba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, remote influences from other regions may also play a role (Krishnamurthy & Krishnamurthy, 2016). For example, the Southern Ocean (Zhang et al., 2021), South Atlantic (Xue et al., 2018), extratropical Pacific (Krishnamurthy & Krishnamurthy, 2016), and the North Atlantic Oscillation (Xie et al., 2021) may contribute to the Indian Ocean multidecadal variability. We also notice that current climate models (e.g., CESM1) tend to overestimate the magnitude of the SST variability in the southeastern Indian Ocean, which implies that the models may not realistically simulate the decadal to multidecadal variations (Kravtsov et al., 2018; Mann et al., 2020) or inter‐basin teleconnection (Cai et al., 2019; Li et al., 2016) for the Indian Ocean.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, remote influences from other regions may also play a role (Krishnamurthy & Krishnamurthy, 2016). For example, the Southern Ocean (Zhang et al., 2021), South Atlantic (Xue et al., 2018), extratropical Pacific (Krishnamurthy & Krishnamurthy, 2016), and the North Atlantic Oscillation (Xie et al., 2021) may contribute to the Indian Ocean multidecadal variability. We also notice that current climate models (e.g., CESM1) tend to overestimate the magnitude of the SST variability in the southeastern Indian Ocean, which implies that the models may not realistically simulate the decadal to multidecadal variations (Kravtsov et al., 2018; Mann et al., 2020) or inter‐basin teleconnection (Cai et al., 2019; Li et al., 2016) for the Indian Ocean.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N is the sample size, ρ XX (j) and ρ YY (j) denote the autocorrelations of time series X and Y at time lag j, respectively (Sun et al 2017, Xue et al 2018b, 2018c.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance for decadal‐scale linear regression and correlation is assessed based on a two‐tailed Student's t ‐test using the effective number of degrees of freedom N eff , which is given by the following approximation: 1Neff1N+2Nj=1NNjNρXX(j)ρYY(j), $\frac{1}{{N}^{\text{eff}}}\approx \frac{1}{N}+\frac{2}{N}\sum\limits _{j=1}^{N}\frac{N-j}{N}{\rho }_{XX}(j){\rho }_{YY}(j),$ where N is the sample size, ρXX(j) ${\rho }_{XX}(j)$ and ρYY(j) ${\rho }_{YY}(j)$ separately represent the autocorrelations of time series X $X$ and Y $Y$ at time lag j $j$ (Pyper & Peterman, 1998; Xue et al., 2018, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%