1995
DOI: 10.2307/2645800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

South Korea's Big Business Clientelism in Democratic Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the state does not hesitate to chastise the chaebol whenever it acts disrespectfully (cf. Nam, 1995).…”
Section: Society As Hyperfeminized Confucian Daughter-wifementioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the same time, the state does not hesitate to chastise the chaebol whenever it acts disrespectfully (cf. Nam, 1995).…”
Section: Society As Hyperfeminized Confucian Daughter-wifementioning
confidence: 95%
“…This mode of clientelism in Korea can be traced back to the relationship between political elites and large businesses under the authoritarian regime of the 1970s and 1980s (Nam, 1995;Park, 2008). Rapid industrialisation and the concentration of political power in politicians who served the regime were the social background of facilitating clientelism.…”
Section: Institutional Reforms Beyond Clientelism In South Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, democratisation in 1987 had the potential to be the end of clientelism and corrupt practices in Korea. Yet, such a blueprint was not realised, however, until Chung Ju-yong, the leader of the Hyundai Conglomerate, made an unprecedented bid for the presidency in 1992 (Nam, 1995). Chung wanted to end the old tradition of reciprocity existing between government and big business and publicly disclosed the informal ties.…”
Section: Institutional Reforms Beyond Clientelism In South Koreamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91-142) on Brazil and South Africa; Payne (1994) on Brazil; Conaghan and Malloy (1994, pp. 86-97) on Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru; Nam (1995) and Bellin (2000) on South Korea; Parsa (1995) on Iran and, to a lesser extent, the Philippines; and Yılmaz (1999) on Turkey. Working class.-Critics of the bourgeoisie's role in democratization argue that elites support only limited political openings that they are able to control, and that full democratization is the work of the working class. Rueschemeyer et al (1992) present the most extended case material for this position.…”
Section: Class Actors and Democratizationmentioning
confidence: 99%