2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137026859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As its working assumption, this study adopts the broad definition of civil society proposed by the English School of International Relations (Quayle, 2013, pp. 108–110).…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As its working assumption, this study adopts the broad definition of civil society proposed by the English School of International Relations (Quayle, 2013, pp. 108–110).…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It analyzes civil society from a wider perspective by including additional groups, such as immigrants, foreign workers, and tourists, which are not formally organized and lack a sense of joint identity or goal. However, these groups influence policy decisions based on their identification by others as a group with shared characteristics and similar interests (Quayle, 2013, p. 110). For instance, migrant workers in the Philippines, despite not being institutionally organized, formed a powerful lobby that influenced official policy based on their common perception as national heroes who suffered alienation to provide financial support to their families at home.…”
Section: Methodological and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper does precisely this by centring its analysis on the complex and contested process of negotiating regional order and social roles in Southeast Asia during and after formal decolonization. It builds on existing ES work that has analysed how the institutional structures of decolonized SEA emerged and were shaped by the agency of indigenous actors in their interactions with external great powers and global international society (Quayle 2013; Spandler 2019). It takes a different route than these socio-institutional accounts, however, positioning its analysis of social roles within an ES conceptualization of international order, embedded within a broader conception of an uneven capitalist world-system and subject to the politics of sub-state and transnational social forces.…”
Section: Social Roles and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%