“…This differs from existing geographical research on music which reflects broader cultural geographical interests in the tradition of Berkeley cultural geography (see a recent review by Nash and Carney, 1996). In that tradition, research tends to be much more descriptive, observing, for example, the spatial distribution of musical forms, activities, performers and personalities (Crowley, 1987;Carney, 1987a;1987b); musical hearths and diffusion of musical styles (Jackson, 1952;Ford, 1971;Francaviglia, 1978;Carney, 1987c;Glasgow, 1987;and Horsley, 1987), and delimiting areas that share certain musical traits (Lomax, 1960;Lomax and Erickson, 1971;Burman-Hall, 1975;Gastil, 1975;Nash, 1975), or relatedly, identifying the character and personality of places as gleaned from lyrics, melody, instrumentation and the general 'feel' or sensory impact of the music (Gleason, 1969;Curtis and Rose, 1987;and Curtis, 1987). While interesting and valuable, much of this work tends to focus very much on music in North America, in particular, the U.S.A. (see, for example, Carney, 1987), which, in many ways, has been one of the tremendous forces of cultural influence, and which some would describe as one of the sources of western cultural imperialism.…”