2004
DOI: 10.1080/0140238042000228077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southern European Public Bureaucracies in Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
12

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
84
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It contributes to knowledge regarding the use of performance information by politicians in a country undergoing a period of 'transition' in introducing NPMlike techniques. Our findings add to literature review regarding the limited use of performance information in the public context (Ter Bogt, 2003Pollitt, 2006a;Askim, 2007;Moynihan and Pandey, 2010) and particularly in a Southern European country where the traditional bureaucracy may difficult the introduction of NPM reforms (Sotiropoulos, 2004). However, additional research is necessary to investigate the circumstances under which politicians are likely to use performance information to evaluate top mangers' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It contributes to knowledge regarding the use of performance information by politicians in a country undergoing a period of 'transition' in introducing NPMlike techniques. Our findings add to literature review regarding the limited use of performance information in the public context (Ter Bogt, 2003Pollitt, 2006a;Askim, 2007;Moynihan and Pandey, 2010) and particularly in a Southern European country where the traditional bureaucracy may difficult the introduction of NPM reforms (Sotiropoulos, 2004). However, additional research is necessary to investigate the circumstances under which politicians are likely to use performance information to evaluate top mangers' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These distinctive characteristics may set Portugal apart from the rest of the West European bureaucracies (Sotiropoulos, 2004) on the adoption of NPM reforms. Despite these features of the political/administrative context, in the last two decades, the succes sive Portuguese governments have implemented several administrative reforms (Araújo, 2001(Araújo, , 2002CorteReal, 2008;Gomes and Mendes, 2013) with the aim 'to introduce a new managerial rationality in public services, replacing the traditional approach to public management by the introduction of new managerial techniques' (Araújo and Branco, 2009:557).…”
Section: Institutional Reforms In Portuguese Local Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, many of the issues discussed in this article are linked to the administrative capacity of the public sector, especially in relation to the organization of the asylum system. Public administration in Greece has been marked by high levels of centralization, clientelist relations between the government and the civil service and inefficiency (Featherstone 2005;Sotiropoulos 2004). It is not surprising that the asylum system has reflected these shortcomings, but as Tsibiridou (2004) has noted, the inability to create procedural frameworks based on law has had adverse effects on the rights of migrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that besides having sufficient financial resources for the bureaucracy, the implementation process also depends on the strength of bureaucracy, translated as: a) the independence of the administration from politics; b) a clearly specified legal framework for the bureaucracy, and c) the accountability of the bureaucracy as a crucial factor that contributes towards its own quality and effectiveness (Hille, Knill, 2006). Whereas, Dimitri A. Sotiropulos, in his study, finds out that the public bureaucracies of Southern Europe (Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain) until mid of 1990's were characterised by interrelated characteristics such as: a) party politicians working in higher civil service; b) patronage patterns of personnel recruitment to the public sector; and c) lack of human resources in the public sector and lack of implementation (Sotiropoulos, 2004). In contrast to the Central and Eastern European Countries where the implementation of the acquis has been a question of bureaucracy rather than political veto, in the case of Albania, both factors have been influential.…”
Section: A) Uneven Distribution Of Human Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%