2020
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1791040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Southern Theory without a North: City Conceptualization as the Theoretical Metropolis

Abstract: There have been calls to broaden urban theory to incorporate learnings from the Southern or ordinary cities (periphery). These calls are often placed as a counter to the hegemony of the Northern cities (metropolis), which have long been the sites for producing theory. If the metropolis is a concept to describe clustering of power and knowledge, then geographical located-ness of this metropolis in the North is theoretically stifling. Therefore, we need to investigate the formation of metropolises within various… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reflecting on future directions for urban political ecology we need to consider two intersecting processes in particular: first, the shifting geographies of urbanization; and second, the institutional landscapes within which urban theory itself is evolving. The intellectual terrain of urban political ecology is still heavily marked by what Edgar Pieterse terms the ‘gravitational pull’ of Anglo-American global theory despite the extending empirical reach of new urban and environmental research into the diverse metropolitan landscapes of the global South (see Pieterse, 2013; Palat Narayanan, 2021). Although alternative circuits of environmental knowledge production do exist – consider, for example, the regular book fairs held in Guadalajara and Chennai, for Spanish and Tamil language literatures, respectively – there remain formidable cultural, economic, and institutional barriers towards the dissemination of these works in the global North (see Collyer, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reflecting on future directions for urban political ecology we need to consider two intersecting processes in particular: first, the shifting geographies of urbanization; and second, the institutional landscapes within which urban theory itself is evolving. The intellectual terrain of urban political ecology is still heavily marked by what Edgar Pieterse terms the ‘gravitational pull’ of Anglo-American global theory despite the extending empirical reach of new urban and environmental research into the diverse metropolitan landscapes of the global South (see Pieterse, 2013; Palat Narayanan, 2021). Although alternative circuits of environmental knowledge production do exist – consider, for example, the regular book fairs held in Guadalajara and Chennai, for Spanish and Tamil language literatures, respectively – there remain formidable cultural, economic, and institutional barriers towards the dissemination of these works in the global North (see Collyer, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many academic studies, including several focused on Colombo, have juxtaposed the urban imaginaries of planners and state representatives with the lived practices and experiences of city-dwellers, particularly those engaged in informal labor and marginalized from power (e.g. Elyachar, 2010;Palat Narayanan, 2020a;Palat Narayanan and Veron, 2018;Perera, 2009;Simone, 2004). This article takes a slightly different approach, inspired by Ananya Roy's argument that "informality is not synonymous with poverty" (2009: 82).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embracing ‘multiepistemic literacy’ (Kuokkanen, 2011) and relational ontologies also facilitates the broadening of methodological approaches, and pursuing alternative forms of inquiry that foster a non-hierarchical dialogue between different ways and traditions of being and knowing. Research conducted with a decolonial perspective on topics as diverse as street food (Palat Narayanan, 2021), digital technologies (Newell and Pype, 2021), embodiment (Zaragocin and Caretta, 2021) and wilderness (Vannini and Vannini, 2019) demonstrate various ways of interacting with multiple worlds, and new forms of collaboration that are geared toward studying multiplicities and connections. They also illustrate how knowledge production can be decolonized in practical terms, and guide us toward theorizing not just about the South, but theorizing with and from the South.…”
Section: De-scaling Differencementioning
confidence: 99%