2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2971313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sovereign Default Risk, Fiscal Adjustment, and Debt Renegotiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the spending side, public investment often becomes the adjustment variable of choice when governments are unable to tax the private sector, as explained by Joo (2014).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the spending side, public investment often becomes the adjustment variable of choice when governments are unable to tax the private sector, as explained by Joo (2014).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mendoza and Yue (2012) use β = 0.88 and R − 1 = 1%. Guimaraes (2011), Roldán-Peña (2012), Joo (2014), Gornemann (2015), Gordon and Guerrón-Quintana (2017) and Park (2017) also consider a sovereign default models with capital. All but one of them rely on similar parameter values for β and R in order to motivate borrowing in the long run.…”
Section: A New Motive To Borrow Internationallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Furthermore, by introducing capital this paper bridges the gap between the sovereign default literature and the canonical RBC model. Guimaraes (2011), Roldán-Peña (2012), Joo (2014), Gornemann (2015), Gordon and Guerrón-Quintana (2017) and Park (2017) also introduce capital into an Eaton and Gersovitz (1981) default model. I add to these paper by also modeling financial frictions and exploring how these can lead to a persistent motive to borrow and endogenous costs of default.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%