2009
DOI: 10.1080/14650040902827765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sovereign Wealth Funds and National Security: The Dog that Will Refuse to Bark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of their performance given their specific governance (political influences, long-term investment horizon, opacity) has also been explored (Bernstein et al, 2013;Ang, 2012). On the political side, some specific investments gave rise to hot political debate on whether such politically-flavoured investors could be a threat to national security (Kirshner, 2009) and could indirectly encourage capital account protectionism (Johnson, 2007). The scope of this branch of papers relates to business practices such as corporate governance and ethics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of their performance given their specific governance (political influences, long-term investment horizon, opacity) has also been explored (Bernstein et al, 2013;Ang, 2012). On the political side, some specific investments gave rise to hot political debate on whether such politically-flavoured investors could be a threat to national security (Kirshner, 2009) and could indirectly encourage capital account protectionism (Johnson, 2007). The scope of this branch of papers relates to business practices such as corporate governance and ethics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent they exist, however, such motives are very far from the kind of offensive attempts to manipulate the countries hosting SWF investments that critics in some of these countries have alleged. Although most academic authors are quick to dismiss the more alarmist and protectionist responses to SWF investments as unfounded, the underlying shift in the distribution of wealth in the international system does constitute significant change in the international geopolitical balance of power (Kirshner 2009). There is, however, no straightforward metric for assessing the implications of such a shift.…”
Section: Mixed Motives and Paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 . In 2006, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) attempted to take over Unocal, the California-based US oil company, but was blocked by political opposition in Congress (Shortgen 2006; for more general discussions, also see Cohen 2009;Kirshner 2009;Truman 2008;Weiss 2008;Wu and Seah 2008;Ziemba 2007). 11 .…”
Section: Three Explanatory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With regard to SWF investment behaviour, observers agree that until now SWFs have been guided almost exclusively by considerations of return: they seem to have been called into existence primarily to realize greater returns than the more traditional ways of investing currency reserves. Their investment decisions (although not always successful) cannot be shown to be determined by noneconomic considerations (Kirshner 2009). They do, however, differ substantially from other new players in the global financial markets such as private equity and hedge funds: SWFs have a much longer time horizon, which may have implications for the future (Butt et al 2008).…”
Section: Motivesmentioning
confidence: 98%