1991
DOI: 10.1016/0160-791x(91)90020-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet math and science educational reforms during perestroika

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The social and political upheavals of the 20th century initiated considerable change and specialized mathematical knowledge became an explicit objective internationally. For example, focused on equity and a perceived need for national economic competitiveness, specialized goals were evident in the former Soviet Union (Ailes & Rushing, 1991;Karp, 2006;Romberg, 1984) and many of its satellites (Andrews, 2003;Bodovski et al, 2014). Elsewhere, following the end of the Second World War, the elite imperative could be found in the introduction of Bourbakian mathematics into many Western curricula (Andrews, 2015).…”
Section: Defining the Purpose Of School Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social and political upheavals of the 20th century initiated considerable change and specialized mathematical knowledge became an explicit objective internationally. For example, focused on equity and a perceived need for national economic competitiveness, specialized goals were evident in the former Soviet Union (Ailes & Rushing, 1991;Karp, 2006;Romberg, 1984) and many of its satellites (Andrews, 2003;Bodovski et al, 2014). Elsewhere, following the end of the Second World War, the elite imperative could be found in the introduction of Bourbakian mathematics into many Western curricula (Andrews, 2015).…”
Section: Defining the Purpose Of School Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond that, they were fascinated by the application of theory to issues and policies-practical analysis that previously would have been dangerous in the Soviet Union. As Ailes and Rushing (1991) pointed out, instruction in Marxism-Leninism was supposed to legitimatize the regime, not prepare students for economic analysis and decisionmaking.…”
Section: Obstacles To Continued Curriculum Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%