For energetic production, differents lignocellulosic biomass sources were characterized energetically along two years in Huelva (South-west region, in Spain). Then, the differents kinds of lignocellulosic biomass were evaluated and classified for using like fuel for electric power generation in the area.The groupings of the average humidity values and average gross heating values (over dry basis) of samples analyzed were made based on the type of material and in larger groups, were estimated the average values in subgroups. In areas dominated study samples related to the cultivation of eucalyptus account for 35% of the samples. The next group of materials is made up of different waste materials derived from agricultural crops (cotton, olive, corn, grapes), to 21.1%. The next group is derived from the cultivation of pine, with 18.0%, garden waste with 13.7% and fruit crop residues with 7.0%. Table 1 presents in descending order of average gross heating value, except for some individual samples from the bottom of the table.The 6-cluster scheme allowed us to classify the different groups of materials. Thus, cluster 1 in this scheme coincided with the Cinder and Coal Characteristic Group (60% of samples). Also, the gross heating value of cluster 2 differed by only 3.8% and 2.2% from the mean gross heating value for Pine Bark and Wet Marc, respectively. The gross heating value for cluster 3 differed by only 0.6% from that for the Pine derivatives with the lowest heating values (Sawdust, Sawmill Residues, Pine Grindings and Pine Splinters), and by 0.1% and 3.4% from those for the Eucalyptus derivatives with the highest values (Eucalyptus Splinters and Grindings, respectively). Cluster 4 was associated to Eucalyptus Bark, with a difference of only 1.3% from its mean gross heating value. Finally, the other clusters encompassed the different types of residues (Agricultural, Gardening, Fruit) and waste (Sewage