2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soybean root growth and yield in rotation with cover crops under chiseling and no-till

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
84
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, effects of crop rotation on soil quality, increasing soybean yield, can only be observed in the medium and long term, as stated by Calonego & Rosolem (2010). These results were obtained without considering the fall-winter crop, because S values were greater in treatments including the spring crops (Figure 5a), and the S value was highest (S = 0.08) in triticale plus pearl millet.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, effects of crop rotation on soil quality, increasing soybean yield, can only be observed in the medium and long term, as stated by Calonego & Rosolem (2010). These results were obtained without considering the fall-winter crop, because S values were greater in treatments including the spring crops (Figure 5a), and the S value was highest (S = 0.08) in triticale plus pearl millet.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…These results were obtained without considering the fall-winter crop, because S values were greater in treatments including the spring crops (Figure 5a), and the S value was highest (S = 0.08) in triticale plus pearl millet. Interestingly, greatest root growth (pearl millet and soybean) was observed in this soil layer, as discussed by Calonego & Rosolem (2010). Further comparisons of WRC showed that in the first and third year, soil moisture at saturation was increased by cover crops in the 0.075-0.125 m layer (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This is supported by the results presented in figure 6a in the triticale+chiseling treatment, where the percentage of samples with Db < Db c in the 0-20 cm layer, decreased from 88 to 56 % between the first and third year of the experiment. These results explain the decrease in soybean yield with this mechanical management, compared with plots under crop rotation (Calonego & Rosolem, 2010). In contrast, in the 20-40 cm layer, although the Db c values increased in most treatments with cover crops, the values still remained lower than in chiseled plots (Figure 5b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Alleto and Coquet (2009) also found that changes in Db could be detected for less than five months after sowing, but in general, there are very few published studies that thoroughly describe temporal effects of furrow openers on soil physical condition. In contrast, other studies have shown that temporal changes in Db can be detected for six months to one year (Calonego and Rosolem, 2010;Leão et al, 2014) after chiseling previous NT sites.…”
Section: Bulk Densitymentioning
confidence: 61%