Soybeans (Glycine max) and Soybean Products in Poultry and Swine Nutrition

Dourado, Leilane Rocha Barros; Pascoal, Leonardo Augusto Fonseca; Sakomura, Nilva Kazue; Costa, Fernando Guilherme Perazzo; Biagiotti, Daniel

doi:10.5772/18071

Cited by 13 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Commercial broilers; Patterson et al (1998) The cases for mixed crop-livestock farming systems in EUNEP (2015); Powell and Rotz (2015) Watershed scale Pig and poultry systems in Netherland (Oenema, 2006) The The pig production system in the whole pork supply chains (Uwizeye et al, 2019) The combination of feed production and pig production systems in Uwizeye et al (2019) multiple co-products or by-products, such as oil and soybean meal (Dourado et al, 2011), which can be sold to customers or be recycled within the Agro-Food system. Most studies estimate the productive outputs of consumed food based on household surveys or daily-intake guidelines (Leach et al, 2012;Ma et al, 2010), instead of actually following the nutrient flows from the upstream source and through the supply chain.…”

Section: Landscape Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying Nutrient Budgets for Sustainable Nutrient Management

Zhang

Davidson

Zou

et al. 2020

Global Biogeochemical Cycles

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, provide vital support for human life, but overloading nutrients to the Earth system leads to environmental concerns, such as water and air pollution on local scales and climate change on the global scale. With an urgent need to feed the world's growing population and the growing concern over nutrient pollution and climate change, sustainable nutrient management has become a major challenge for this century. To address this challenge, the growing body of research on nutrient budgets, namely the nutrient inputs and outputs of a given system, has provided great opportunities for improving scientific knowledge of the complex nutrient cycles in the coupled human and natural systems. This knowledge can help inform stakeholders, such as farmers, consumers, and policy makers, on their decisions related to nutrient management. This paper systematically reviews major challenges, as well as opportunities, in defining, quantifying, and applying nutrient budgets. Nutrient budgets have been defined for various systems with different research or application purposes, but the lack of consistency in the system definition and its budget terms has hindered intercomparison among studies and experience‐sharing among researchers and regions. Our review synthesizes existing nutrient budgets under a framework with five systems (i.e., Soil‐Plant system, Animal system, Animal‐Plant‐Soil system, Agro‐Food system, and Landscape system) and four spatial scales (i.e., Plot and Farm, Watershed, National, and Global scales). We define these systems and identify issues of nitrogen and phosphorus budgets within each. Few nutrient budgets have been well balanced at any scale, due to the large uncertainties in the quantification of several major budget terms. The type and level of challenges vary across spatial scales and also differ among nutrients. Improvement in nutrient budgets will rely not only on the technological advancement of scientific observations and models but also on better bookkeeping of human activity data. While some nutrient budget terms may need decades, or even centuries, of research to be well quantified within desirable levels of uncertainties, it is imperative to effectively communicate to interested stakeholders our understanding of nutrient budgets so that scientists and a variety of stakeholders can work together to address the sustainable nutrient management challenge of this century.

show abstract

Section: Landscape Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantifying Nutrient Budgets for Sustainable Nutrient Management

Zhang

Davidson

Zou

et al. 2020

Global Biogeochemical Cycles

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Soybeans must be treated to remove these ANFs, which is especially important in the case of monogastric diets. Numerous protease inhibitors known as trypsin inhibitors (Rada et al, 2017), hemagglutinins or lectins (Ebere, 2016;Udeogu and Awuchi, 2016), goitrogens (Barros Dourado et al, 2011;Bajaj et al, 2016), saponins (Omizu et al, 2011;Chaturvedi et al, 2012), and urease are among the harmful components in soybeans (Khan et al, 2013;Real-Guerra et al, 2013). The prevalence of these components in relatively high concentrations limits the use of soybeans and their derivatives in monogastric diets.…”

Section: Anti-nutritional Factors (Anf) In Soybeanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Various Methods of Processing Soybeans on Protein Digestibility and Reduction of Nitrogen Deposits in the Natural Environment – A Review

Asghar,

Sajid,

Wilk

et al. 2024

Annals of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soybean meal (SBM) is a significant source of protein for poultry due to its high concentration of protein and amino acids profile. The primary objective of SBM processing is the reduction and deactivation of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) to enhance nutrient digestibility. However, eliminating ANFs does not necessarily correlate with increased protein and amino acid content. Several processing methods, such as soaking, cooking, and commercial techniques, improve SBM protein digestibility. To sustain feeding qualities, soybeans must undergo heating to remove inherent chemicals that interfering with poultry digestion. However, both under and over-processing can impair meal digestibility. Extrusion heating significantly contributes to protein and starch digestibility while reducing certain ANFs. Thermomechanical and enzyme-assisted procedures reduce heat-resistant proteins more efficiently than extraction methods, producing soy protein concentrate (SPC) and fermentation. These techniques reduce ANFs in SBM, activating digestive enzymes and alleviating digestive tract pressure, leading to decreased endogenous protein deficits. Exogenous enzyme supplementation is a biotechnological approach for enhancing the nutritional content of SBM and certain other protein-rich products. However, different processing methods not only affect protein digestibility but also impact poultry production, gastrointestinal health, and the environment due to higher nitrogen excrement. Ammonia (NH3) emissions, are a significant environmental concern in chicken farming, resulting from uric acid production during protein consumption. It has a negative impact on the environment and the health of birds/humans. This review investigates the impact of several processing techniques on the digestibility of SBM protein and the reduction of N2 regarding one health concept. Future research should focus on identifying optimal processing methods maximizing protein digestibility while minimizing environmental nitrogen impacts.

show abstract

“…Moreover, when properly supplemented with cereals, it fully meets the essential amino acid requirements for all livestock, making it the standard to which other plant protein sources are compared [ 3 ]. Soybean contains about 40% protein and 20% fat [ 4 ], but its nutritional composition depends mainly on the percentage of anti-nutritional factors, variety, the efficiency of the oil extraction process and the amount of husk residue or heat treatment [ 5 ]. The main problem with using soybean protein is the public’s aversion to genetically modified plants and fear of their impact on the health aspect of food products.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Quality of Eggs Derived from Japanese Quail Fed with the Fermented and Non-Fermented Rapeseed Meal

Wengerska

Czech

Knaga

et al. 2022

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most popular protein source in poultry feed mixtures is soybean. However, cheaper and more available alternative protein sources are being sought, and feed manufacturers more and more often turn their attention to the post-extraction meals of local oil plants, e.g., rapeseed. Therefore, the effect of fermented and non-fermented post-extraction rapeseed meal used as a feed additive for Japanese quails was investigated on the eggs’ quality. The study was performed on 280 females of Japanese quails fed with a mixture without rapeseed meal, with non-fermented post-extraction rapeseed meal (5%, 10% and 15%) and with fermented one (5%, 10% and 15%). During the experiment, eggs were collected from each group four times (every 4 weeks) and evaluated for their quality characteristics. The addition of 10% fermented rapeseed meal had the most beneficial effect on such eggs quality traits as egg weight, specific gravity, yolk index and color and albumen pH. However, in the majority of examined parameters, no significant differences were found between birds fed with soybean meal and those fed with fermented and non-fermented rapeseed meal (morphological elements proportions, yolk weight, albumen height and Haugh’s units, eggshell quality). This supports the thesis that the use of rapeseed meals instead of soybean meals may allow obtaining the proper quality of animal raw materials at a lower cost and with the use of local feed resources.

show abstract

Soybeans (Glycine max) and Soybean Products in Poultry and Swine Nutrition

Cited by 13 publications

References 40 publications

Quantifying Nutrient Budgets for Sustainable Nutrient Management

Quantifying Nutrient Budgets for Sustainable Nutrient Management

Influence of Various Methods of Processing Soybeans on Protein Digestibility and Reduction of Nitrogen Deposits in the Natural Environment – A Review

The Quality of Eggs Derived from Japanese Quail Fed with the Fermented and Non-Fermented Rapeseed Meal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About