Handbuch Sozialpolitik 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sozialpolitik in Demokratien und Autokratien

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of LTC, these could be groups directly affected by (the risk of ) care dependency, but also those indirectly affected, such as family caregivers and people working in the formal care sector. Although the connection between regime type and the size of the welfare state is not straightforward (Schmidt 2019;Schmitt et al 2015, 511), we explore the following hypothesis: The more democratic a country is, the higher is the likelihood of LTC system introduction (H3d, regime type hypothesis).…”
Section: National Constellationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of LTC, these could be groups directly affected by (the risk of ) care dependency, but also those indirectly affected, such as family caregivers and people working in the formal care sector. Although the connection between regime type and the size of the welfare state is not straightforward (Schmidt 2019;Schmitt et al 2015, 511), we explore the following hypothesis: The more democratic a country is, the higher is the likelihood of LTC system introduction (H3d, regime type hypothesis).…”
Section: National Constellationsmentioning
confidence: 99%