2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space and embodiment in informal learning

Abstract: Changes in pedagogy to emphasise independent study and group work have increased the need for informal learning spaces on campuses. University libraries have been quick to respond to this need, partly because of the decline in book lending and partly because of technology enablers. Furthermore, new types of buildings that combine many types of facility, including libraries and informal learning spaces, are being built. This research aimed to explore students' experience of such informal learning spaces, throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study reported here uses the same interpretative methodology that such new methods adopt. Building on a previous study in the same context based on focus groups and interviews (Cox, 2018a;Cox 2018b) it uses the participatory walking interview method, with six students and two members of staff. Walking interviews, as the name suggests, invite participants to take the interviewer on a guided walk through a space that they use, and to talk about their experiences there.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study reported here uses the same interpretative methodology that such new methods adopt. Building on a previous study in the same context based on focus groups and interviews (Cox, 2018a;Cox 2018b) it uses the participatory walking interview method, with six students and two members of staff. Walking interviews, as the name suggests, invite participants to take the interviewer on a guided walk through a space that they use, and to talk about their experiences there.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essentially a variation on participant observation (Kusenbach, 2003). It has been used in a number of social science fields (Clark & Emmel, 2010Evans & Jones, 2011Henshaw, 2014;Pink, 2015), but only in a limited way in the information field (Cox, 2018a;Polkinghorne, Given, & Carlson, 2017;Thomson, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this, a compatible and fit learning atmosphere which considering all prominent aspects begin to be a prime issue that cogitates among members of academia around the world (Ibrahim, Fadzil, & Saruwono, 2013;Nenonen, 2015). Accordingly, some spatial alignment and assessment on existing learning setting are crucial to in-line with the 21st century education transformation and education 4.0 (Cox, 2017). To be very specific, existing learning theories that are exploited in higher education system designated as behaviourism, cognitivism, and social constructivism are assorted as conventional learning theories which occurred during the deficiency of technologies in teaching and learning.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different spaces engender different styles of reading (McLaughlin, 2015). For example, the sensory experience of libraries is central to their role as places to read and undertake other informal learning tasks (Cox, 2017). Indeed, from this perspective the embodied nature of learning is applicable to traditional academic tasks and the traditional domains of information literacy, as it is to the context of professional practice so emphasized by Lloyd.…”
Section: Embodied Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%