2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space debris generation in GEO: Space materials testing and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on recent estimates, the number of orbital debris in space amounts to 139 million [4]. Such overpopulation of debris increases the chance of several events that could lead to catastrophic consequences, such as collisions, fragmentations, and uncontrolled reentries in the Earth's atmosphere [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Such a risk forced worldwide space agencies to develop a set of countermeasures to prevent and/or mitigate possible threats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on recent estimates, the number of orbital debris in space amounts to 139 million [4]. Such overpopulation of debris increases the chance of several events that could lead to catastrophic consequences, such as collisions, fragmentations, and uncontrolled reentries in the Earth's atmosphere [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Such a risk forced worldwide space agencies to develop a set of countermeasures to prevent and/or mitigate possible threats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, developing and updating debris population models [17] as well as analysing the vulnerability of spacecraft architectures and components [18,19] is essential to finding solutions for reducing the degradation of the debris environment. In addition, ground test activities on large [20][21][22] and small [23,24] spacecraft mock-ups, CubeSat [25] and Picosat [26,27] models, as well as the development of numerical simulation tools [28][29][30][31][32] through the utilization of ground test data and space breakup event observations are fundamental steps in understanding the generation of space debris formation [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Meanwhile, spacecraft serve in a complex space environment, especially in low Earth orbit, which mainly includes high-vacuum and high-energy charged particle irradiation. 11,12 High-energy electrons and protons irradiation further exacerbate the embrittlement of CE resins, which poses a great threat to the normal operation, in-orbit reliability, as well as the lifetime of spacecraft and is one of the main causes of spacecraft material degradation and damage. 13,14 Given that CE resins are inherently brittle, 15 and the space environment exacerbates the embrittlement, microcracks can easily appear within the resin during spacecraft service, which could seriously damage the structural integrity of the materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, CE resins have poor fracture toughness and are prone to microcracks under service loads, thus destroying the structural integrity of the materials 9,10 . Meanwhile, spacecraft serve in a complex space environment, especially in low Earth orbit, which mainly includes high‐vacuum and high‐energy charged particle irradiation 11,12 . High‐energy electrons and protons irradiation further exacerbate the embrittlement of CE resins, which poses a great threat to the normal operation, in‐orbit reliability, as well as the lifetime of spacecraft and is one of the main causes of spacecraft material degradation and damage 13,14…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%