2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space Preference at James White Library: What Students Really Want

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Oliveira (2016) 54% of students preferred spaces designed for group interactions and 46% preferred individual study areas. This reinforces the idea that while group interactions are popular, individual study areas still need to be a priority in academic libraries (Oliveira, 2016). Overall library usage also tends to go up towards the end of the semester suggesting that library use is directly related to studying as opposed to social interactions (Applegate, 2009).…”
Section: How Students Are Using Library Spacessupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a study by Oliveira (2016) 54% of students preferred spaces designed for group interactions and 46% preferred individual study areas. This reinforces the idea that while group interactions are popular, individual study areas still need to be a priority in academic libraries (Oliveira, 2016). Overall library usage also tends to go up towards the end of the semester suggesting that library use is directly related to studying as opposed to social interactions (Applegate, 2009).…”
Section: How Students Are Using Library Spacessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Graduate students are perceived to value traditional individual study spaces in library facilities more than undergraduates, but studies suggest that both groups value the (Oliveira, 2016). Surprisingly, graduate students are more interested in social spaces than undergraduate students are (Oliveira, 2016).…”
Section: How Students Are Using Library Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ranged from quantitative, intensive seat counts (Dotson & Garris, 2008) to the purely creative setting of the design charrette (Oliveira, 2016;Washburn & Bibb, 2011). Some early studies used a quantitative approach with direct observation sweeps (Applegate, 2009;Dotson & Garris, 2008;Given & Leckie, 2003) and simple paper questionnaires (Gardner & Eng, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 219) from others. Similar research also notes individual study carrels and quiet spaces are valued (Hall & Kapa, 2015;Montgomery & Miller, 2011;Ojennus & Watts, 2017;Oliveira, 2016).…”
Section: Space Attributesmentioning
confidence: 85%