2016
DOI: 10.1038/am.2016.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-resolved quantitative mechanical measurements of soft and supersoft materials by atomic force microscopy

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has proven to be a valuable instrument to characterize quantitatively the mechanical and morphological properties of soft materials. For medium and hard samples (E41 MPa), the nanomechanical accuracy of AFM is well established and ascertained. However, for soft samples, the experimental setup and data analysis for AFM are not yet firmly established. A calibration obtained for homogeneous samples with a Young's modulus ranging from 100 Pa to a few kPa will prove its usefulness for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AFM determined that the thin-stiff, medium-stiff, and thick-stiff hydrogels had a statistically equivalent Young’s modulus values of 950 ± 90 kPa, 1000 ± 90 kPa, and 11000 ± 90 kPa, respectively, which were consistent with the literature. 27,43 There was no statistical differences between the two techniques; the Young’s moduli of soft and intermediate hydrogels at all thicknesses (thin, medium, thick, and bulk) was the same. While the AFM measurements were consistent within the stiff hydrogels (thin, medium, and thick), their Young’s moduli were lower than that acquired using rheology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…AFM determined that the thin-stiff, medium-stiff, and thick-stiff hydrogels had a statistically equivalent Young’s modulus values of 950 ± 90 kPa, 1000 ± 90 kPa, and 11000 ± 90 kPa, respectively, which were consistent with the literature. 27,43 There was no statistical differences between the two techniques; the Young’s moduli of soft and intermediate hydrogels at all thicknesses (thin, medium, thick, and bulk) was the same. While the AFM measurements were consistent within the stiff hydrogels (thin, medium, and thick), their Young’s moduli were lower than that acquired using rheology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We conducted experiments with 64*64 lateral resolution (4096 points) using a pyramid probe with tip radius 20 nm were obtained for each FC. A series of 2–3 FV measurements were carried in various macroscopic positions to enhance the statistical reliability of the experiments …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of 2-3 FV measurements were carried in various macroscopic positions to enhance the statistical reliability of the experiments. [17] The new born chemical residuals on fused silica surface were detected by a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer using an ART FTIR spectrometer HYPARION from Bruker, Germany at room temperature. Spectra were recorded from 600 to 4000cm À 1 using a DlaTGS detector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to consider the most external layers of the cell, For each cell condition, (exact number N of cells used for statistic is shown in Table 1), the mean Young's modulus value E, and its associated effective errors (standard deviation  and standard deviation of the mean E) have been calculated, following the procedure described in details in Ref. 61,72 The results are therefore presented as E ±  (± E). Young's modulus values are typically represented in a semilog10 scale.…”
Section: Measuring the Effective Young's Modulus Of Living Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%