2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2008.00736.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Space-Strike Weapons” and the Soviet Response to SDI*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some of the Soviet opposition to SDI stemmed from suspicions that SDI technologies were offensive, not defensive, and that space‐based lasers could strike ground targets without warning. American policy dismissed such concerns, and the resultant disconnect between US and Soviet views affected the diplomatic debate (Westwick, 2008; see also Podvig, 2004).…”
Section: Sdi As International History Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, some of the Soviet opposition to SDI stemmed from suspicions that SDI technologies were offensive, not defensive, and that space‐based lasers could strike ground targets without warning. American policy dismissed such concerns, and the resultant disconnect between US and Soviet views affected the diplomatic debate (Westwick, 2008; see also Podvig, 2004).…”
Section: Sdi As International History Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Recent efforts from historians of science include Doel, 1997; Krige and Barth, 2006; Westwick, 2008; Hamblin, 2008. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%