Fluid Dynamics Conference 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-2292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time correlation measurements in a hypersonic transitional boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. Since Kimmel 6,15 defines transition onset over a straight cone as the streamwise location where the second mode amplitudes reach a maximum before decaying, transition onset does not occur in the present work. However, transition onset estimated from the surface temperatures occurs in the range R=1960-1990 as previously discussed.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Fluctuation Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…10. Since Kimmel 6,15 defines transition onset over a straight cone as the streamwise location where the second mode amplitudes reach a maximum before decaying, transition onset does not occur in the present work. However, transition onset estimated from the surface temperatures occurs in the range R=1960-1990 as previously discussed.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Fluctuation Datamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the wind tunnel tests, the boundary-layer thickness on a 70 half-angle cone is approximately 1 mm (see §4.1 and figure 8). According to the experimental observations of Kendall (1975), Demetriades (1974), Stetson et al (1983), Stetson & Kimmell (1992a, b) and Kimmel et al (1995), the second-mode wavelength is approximately twice the boundary-layer thickness, i.e. it is --2 mm in the case considered.…”
Section: Uac Parametersmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This instability belongs to the family of trapped acoustic modes propagating in a waveguide between the wall and the sonic line Guschin & Fedorov 1989). The existence of the second mode was established by the experiments of Kendall (1975), Demetriades (1974), Stetson et al (1983) Stetson & Kimmel (1992a,b) and Kimmel, Demetriades & Donaldson (1995). Once the second mode sets in, it becomes the dominant instability since its growth rate tends to exceed that of the first mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides the first vortex instability for the Mach mode, there arises a new, acoustic type of instability (the so-called second mode instability) [4]. Demetriades [5], Kendall [6], Stetson et al [7] were among the first to find the Mach mode in experiments, while Kimmel et al [8], Lachowicz et al [9], and Doggett et al [10] also observed the second mode later in their experiments separately. According to theoretical and numerical studies, the second mode in hypersonic flows is the dominant instability and is expected to govern the occurrence and development of laminar-turbulent transition [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%