2018
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space–time dynamics of optimal wavepackets for streaks in a channel entrance flow

Abstract: The laminar–turbulent transition of a plane channel entrance flow is revisited using global linear optimization analyses and direct numerical simulations. The investigated case corresponds to uniform upstream velocity conditions and a moderate value of Reynolds number so that the two-dimensional developing flow is linearly stable under the parallel flow assumption. However, the boundary layers in the entry zone are capable of supporting the development of streaks, which may experience secondary instability and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inviscid streamwise velocity is larger than unity near the wall because it accelerates along x to conserve the mass flow rate as the radial velocity decreases from its boundary-layer blowing value as the pipe axis is approached. This acceleration gives rise to the local near-wall peak in the Ū profile, also reported in Durst et al (2005) for entry-pipe flow and in Sparrow, Lin & Lundgren (1964), Panton (2013) and Alizard et al (2018) for entry-channel flows. The peak occurs because the inviscid streamwise velocity is larger than the viscous streamwise velocity deficit of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Initial Base Flow In Regions I and Iimentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The inviscid streamwise velocity is larger than unity near the wall because it accelerates along x to conserve the mass flow rate as the radial velocity decreases from its boundary-layer blowing value as the pipe axis is approached. This acceleration gives rise to the local near-wall peak in the Ū profile, also reported in Durst et al (2005) for entry-pipe flow and in Sparrow, Lin & Lundgren (1964), Panton (2013) and Alizard et al (2018) for entry-channel flows. The peak occurs because the inviscid streamwise velocity is larger than the viscous streamwise velocity deficit of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Initial Base Flow In Regions I and Iimentioning
confidence: 55%
“…They reported the generation of streaks, their subsequent transient growth, and the eventual flow breakdown caused by the interaction between the upper and lower boundary layers. More recently, Alizard et al (2018) studied the problem of laminar-to-turbulent transition of a channel-entrance flow subject to optimal wavepackets as initial conditions. Transition was found to be triggered by the secondary instability of the streaky structures forming within the boundary layers.…”
Section: Channel-entrance Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%