1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00670382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time edge geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that, in this case, G = R greatly simplifies computations, and is not an essential limitation [5]. In the full ten dimensional case, more ones appear in the diagonal of this matrix with no effect on our general conclusions.…”
Section: Noncommutative Geometry Of the Closed Friedman Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fact that, in this case, G = R greatly simplifies computations, and is not an essential limitation [5]. In the full ten dimensional case, more ones appear in the diagonal of this matrix with no effect on our general conclusions.…”
Section: Noncommutative Geometry Of the Closed Friedman Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The central role of V in relativity was extended by Schmidt (1971) to the characterization of singularities by incorporating them in the b-boundary OM of space-time. Details of this and subsequent modifications are given in Dodson (1978). We have shown (Dodson and Radivoiovici, 1981) that the connection V in L(2)M induced by V in LM allows another view of singularities by means of the /~-boundary 0M, which contains OM.…”
Section: Space-time Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…∂ µ → 1 R(η) ∂ µ . The choice of the structural group G = R results in great computational simplifications but is not an essential limitation (see [4] and [8,Sect. 3.1]).…”
Section: Geometry Of the Gravitational Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%