1982
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(82)90224-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space-time representation in the brain. The cerebellum as a predictive space-time metric tensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the anatomo-functional architecture of the visual system leads to the situation where a visual event, even discrete (like a single static spot), undergoes a spatiotemporal blurring (Pellionisz and Llinás, 1982) while the activity it evokes on the retina propagates toward the motor centers and muscles. In fact, the snapshot likely corresponds to activities that are spatially and temporally distributed across several regions in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, the anatomo-functional architecture of the visual system leads to the situation where a visual event, even discrete (like a single static spot), undergoes a spatiotemporal blurring (Pellionisz and Llinás, 1982) while the activity it evokes on the retina propagates toward the motor centers and muscles. In fact, the snapshot likely corresponds to activities that are spatially and temporally distributed across several regions in the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This performance is impressive when one considers the distributed nature of signals that encode an object in the brain. Indeed, before the target-evoked retinal activity leads to the recruitment of appropriate muscles, the diverging projections within the visual system and the transmissions of signals through multiple relays with diverse conduction velocities and integration times (Pellionisz and Llinás, 1982;Nowak and Bullier, 1997;Schmolesky et al, 1998) lead to neural signals that are spatially and temporally distributed across several brain regions. Yet the common observation that animals are able to intercept an object at the right place and time suggests that the brain can somehow estimate its current spatiotemporal coordinates (hic et nunc).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural architecture is highly interconnected. Neurons such as Purkinje cells may have upwards of 80,000 input connections, and neurons in cerebral cortex can have upwards of 10,000 output connections (Anderson and Hinton 1981, Pellionisz and Llinas 1982, Sejnowski 1986). …”
Section: Is Cognition Mainly Symbol Manipulation In the Language Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many studies have indicated that LTP is due to an increased effectiveness of monosynaptic connections [1, 11], the possibility that alterations in the activity of excitatory local circuit neurons can also underlie changes in synaptic efficacy has been raised [20]. Recent interest in neural networks as devices for information storage and retrieval [14,19] suggests that interactions between local mosaics of neurons may be important in learning and memory as well as changes in monosynaptic connections. This is especially relevant in the neocortex where 70% of fibers forming asymmetric synapses arise from intrinsic neurons involved in local excitatory circuits [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%