2024
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Space use of invertebrates in terrestrial habitats: Phylogenetic, functional and environmental drivers of interspecific variations

Gwenaëlle Auger,
Julien Pottier,
Jérôme Mathieu
et al.

Abstract: AimWe present the first global database of movement patterns of terrestrial invertebrates, focusing on active dispersal and foraging movements. We depict interspecific variations in movement distances among invertebrates and assess potential drivers of these variations. We finally contrast our results with those of previous vertebrate studies.LocationWorldwide.MethodsWe conducted a meta‐analysis using 176 studies. They provided 411 movement estimates: 175 foraging movement estimates for 101 species, 51 familie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the information extracted from the studies, we further searched within the literature for information on the focal species' generation time, the home range of the two interacting species [44][45][46][47][48] (unfortunately only found for 17 es), the level of generalism of the two interacting species (rated from 1 to 4 depending on whether they interact with only one species, with species from the same genus or family, with species from the same order, or with species from different orders) and interaction strengths between pairs of species (electronic supplementary material, table S2). These interaction strengths between pairs of species found in the database are given as standardized effects of the presence or abundance of the interacting species on a fitness-related trait in the focal species (survival, fecundity, body condition, body growth or abundance), found either directly in the screened articles (166 es) or in a larger literature search (191 es; interaction strength was missing for 40 es).…”
Section: (C) Effect Size Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the information extracted from the studies, we further searched within the literature for information on the focal species' generation time, the home range of the two interacting species [44][45][46][47][48] (unfortunately only found for 17 es), the level of generalism of the two interacting species (rated from 1 to 4 depending on whether they interact with only one species, with species from the same genus or family, with species from the same order, or with species from different orders) and interaction strengths between pairs of species (electronic supplementary material, table S2). These interaction strengths between pairs of species found in the database are given as standardized effects of the presence or abundance of the interacting species on a fitness-related trait in the focal species (survival, fecundity, body condition, body growth or abundance), found either directly in the screened articles (166 es) or in a larger literature search (191 es; interaction strength was missing for 40 es).…”
Section: (C) Effect Size Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%