1974
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(74)80993-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spacer arms in affinity chromatography: Use of hydrophilic arms to control or eliminate nonbiospecific adsorption effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the spacer arm should ideally be between 9 and 14 Å. This conclusion is in broad agreement with earlier studies carried out with immobilized cofactor derivatives in the non-locking-on mode (2,32,33). It has been suggested that undue lengthening of the spacer arm can result in masking or occlusion of the immobilized ligand due to the ligand-arm assembly adopting a folded conformation (2, 32), but this has not been evident in our studies with the 19.5 Å spacer arms depicted in Figs.…”
Section: Spacer Arm Length and Steric Hindrancesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the spacer arm should ideally be between 9 and 14 Å. This conclusion is in broad agreement with earlier studies carried out with immobilized cofactor derivatives in the non-locking-on mode (2,32,33). It has been suggested that undue lengthening of the spacer arm can result in masking or occlusion of the immobilized ligand due to the ligand-arm assembly adopting a folded conformation (2, 32), but this has not been evident in our studies with the 19.5 Å spacer arms depicted in Figs.…”
Section: Spacer Arm Length and Steric Hindrancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In their earlier studies on bioaffinity chromatography, O'Carra and co-workers reported that nonbiospecific interference due to electrostatic interactions can usually be counteracted by maintaining a high salt concentration in the irrigant (2, 26 -29, 34), while a reinforcement of weak adsorption can be achieved by the introduction of marginal nonbiospecific interactions (termed compound affinity-see 28,33,34). Although our later studies have generally supported this, we have identified one exception: 0.5 M KCl abolishes the biospecific locking-on of bovine liver GDH with glutarate to S 6 -linked immobilized NAD ϩ derivatives (56).…”
Section: Nonbiospecific Interference Due To Electrostatic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast it is completely retained on agarose-hexane and cannot be recovered with up to I M KC1. These opposite behaviours indicate that the non-specific adsorbing capacity of the hexyl spacer arm [20,21] is obliterated by the covalent attachment of AMP at the extremity of the spacer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted however, that the present model does not take into Sepharose 4B maximum binding achieved at n = 12-13; decreased binding n > 13 [42] Sepharose 4B non-specific adsorption at low ionic strength [41] N = N consideration the possibility of a deeply buried binding site in the globular protein, which might be expected to increase the value of n at the onset of the plateau region. Similarly, it is to be expected that separations involving shallow or accessible binding sites may not show increased efficiency at increased spacer length even for n < 12.…”
Section: Surntiiury Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%