2004
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12533-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spaces of coinvariants and fusion product, I: From equivalence theorem to Kostka polynomials

Abstract: The fusion rule gives the dimensions of spaces of conformal blocks in the WZW theory. We prove a dimension formula similar to the fusion rule for spaces of coinvariants of affine Lie algebras g. An equivalence of filtered spaces is established between spaces of coinvariants of two objects: highest weight g-modules and tensor products of finite-dimensional evaluation representations of g ⊗ C[t].In the sl2 case we prove that their associated graded spaces are isomorphic to the spaces of coinvariants of fusion pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second space (2.6) appears as Example 4 in [FJKLM1]. In the special case M i = δ ik M and M i = δ ik M , (2.6) coincides with the space of coinvariants studied in [FKLMM2,FKLMM3].…”
Section: )C[t] ⊕ Ch ⊗ P (T)p (T)c[t] ⊕ Cf ⊗ P (T)c[t] (12)mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second space (2.6) appears as Example 4 in [FJKLM1]. In the special case M i = δ ik M and M i = δ ik M , (2.6) coincides with the space of coinvariants studied in [FKLMM2,FKLMM3].…”
Section: )C[t] ⊕ Ch ⊗ P (T)p (T)c[t] ⊕ Cf ⊗ P (T)c[t] (12)mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recall that V (k) is an associative unital ring over Z, with basis [l] (0 ≤ l ≤ k) and multiplication rule [FJKLM1]. In this paper we also treat such a generalization for (1.2).…”
Section: )C[t] ⊕ Ch ⊗ P (T)p (T)c[t] ⊕ Cf ⊗ P (T)c[t] (12)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we have proved this in special cases, and did numerical checks in others, a complete verification requires tools beyond the scope of this paper, and will require proving a host of new q-identities. A systematic approach towards a full proof will undoubtedly benefit from a better algebrageometric understanding of the role of K-matrices (see, e.g., [10,20,19,21] for some initial studies).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have a Lemma, which follows from the fact that the fusion product is a quotient of the filtered tensor product (2.11) and a standard deformation argument (Lemma 20 of [7]), [5]:…”
Section: Q-systems Kirillov and Reshetikhinmentioning
confidence: 99%